Submitted by PorkFriedBryce t3_zy5ztu in vermont
inelasticplastick t1_j24fvc8 wrote
this is really beautiful
did u make this urself with ai ?
care to share ur process?
PorkFriedBryce OP t1_j24kvo4 wrote
Not affiliated with the company/org, just thought the tech was cool!
All I did was input "Vermont" and then wait for the output which was the image posted above. Mind boggling to say the least...
Midjourney Research Lab
inelasticplastick t1_j24mhr6 wrote
the body of water looks similar to one near me. interesting how many churches there are!
whaletacochamp t1_j24stm3 wrote
It's a stream dude....they all look pretty similar lmao
inelasticplastick t1_j24tonr wrote
ok. is there a problem if it looks similar (the way it curves, the width, etc. ) to the one i know?
edited cuz i posted before finishing my sentence
whaletacochamp t1_j24ufm6 wrote
There's no problem to begin with. Just a funny observation.
AllyEmmie t1_j25uqd4 wrote
You can’t “make art yourself” through AI. The AI stole images off of the internet that belonged to an actual artist, and then made a new image with it. Any prompt created through AI isn’t your art. It’s stolen material.
nixxon t1_j27ed0a wrote
Theoretically that'll get sorted out when people start trying to sell these (good luck with that, btw). Like sampling in music. You can do it if you're creating something new, but you have to pay the creator.
inelasticplastick t1_j26e82b wrote
can one make art themself with a pencil?
AllyEmmie t1_j27xp3l wrote
I don't understand the relevance of your rhetorical question.
inelasticplastick t1_j281t96 wrote
i wasn’t asking my question rhetorically
i view paper and pencil as analagous as art-making tools
my understanding of the law regarding art reproduction seems to be different than u. i guess ais alter images prior to delivery. if that’s the case, assuming the amount of alteration is sufficient, i don’t see any infringement
AllyEmmie t1_j2aodpa wrote
If a human being makes art, and then posts it on the internet, with their brand or signature attached, and then a human-made AI STEALS THAT ART, so YOU can make art WITH THE AI, then that should be illegal
I don't know why you're saying what you're saying. AI is BAD.
inelasticplastick t1_j2apr4k wrote
it’s not illegal tho
all creative outputs are iterations and there is law about how much a work needs to change in order to be “different enough”
AllyEmmie t1_j2bb6tl wrote
Copyright is a law. And if an artist makes something by their own hand, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO TAKE IT, AND CLAIM IT AS YOURS.
YOU can't do that. And an AI shouldn't be allowed to do that either.
AI takes ORIGINAL art pieces, mashes them together, and gives you the result of the prompt you typed in. It's highly grey, lawfully.
inelasticplastick t1_j2bdaa7 wrote
if the work is changed enough it’s fine.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments