Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

VisualMod t1_j6noqkz wrote

You're right, traders have never been this bearish on Treasuries. The aggregate net non-commercial futures contracts is currently at -1 million contracts, which is a record low. This indicates that there is a high level of skepticism among market participants about the future direction of Treasury prices.

^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive

19

y90210 t1_j6nq0tb wrote

Sounds like the same hopium the markets have had (with price increasing) that fed will pivot.

4

[deleted] t1_j6nqmfo wrote

Traders are betting yields will go higher with future rate hikes and hawkishness. They don’t expect a pivot

106

Stack_Silver t1_j6nr94k wrote

Either hubris or planned.

My bet is on planned.

7

Dothemath2 t1_j6nrxcw wrote

Why though? Yields to go up because they are betting inflation is not under control? Doesn’t seem to make sense? Are they thinking massive outflows from treasuries to stocks or maybe US government debt issues or possible default or near default? I think the US will turn itself inside out before they default.

3

Bodybag314 t1_j6ns0fu wrote

The question then comes to mind. Can it be squeezed?

2

mrmrmrj t1_j6ohupx wrote

This does not mean these hedge funds believe bonds will fall. Shorting Treasuries is cheap leverage. This means HFs are boosting gross exposure to chase this market.

36

Aramedlig t1_j6oi3vt wrote

So the institutions are the ones causing the inversion. Nothing says controlling the recession narrative better than this.

14

RowPuzzleheaded3590 t1_j6or7oi wrote

Yes. And there’s several models that suggest recession is either happening or imminent.

But the fed is still hiking to cause unemployment so they can rug pull the economy and the rich can buy everything up, then drop rates for the wealthy to refinance the debt cheaper. And so US gov doesn’t have high treasury interest rates

5

EWJWNNMSG t1_j6pc769 wrote

Or you keep the bond part of your portfolio in something like 25% long bonds and lock the 3.5% in the 10 right now and 75% t-bill and then as the fed keeps getting to 5% you continue aggressively transitioning from the short end to the long end, I would already go beyond 50% of the portfolio if you actually get 4%. You know, as the pros are doing. I'm not of course but that's only because I don't like money

11

spxscalper t1_j6pf14h wrote

It has nothing to do with a pivot or anything else

It's because a particularly regarded political party is willing to default on debt to own the libs

They know it, I know it, everyone knows it. That's the problem with playing with fire. You don't think a guy like Santos isn't willing to blow up the system for personal attention?

They are going to let it go to the last minute. But now all it takes is one house chucklefuck to call for a speaker revote at the wrong time.

That's why shorting treasuries is so OP

−6