NorseTikiBar t1_ixdmkhr wrote
Cities are for people, not for cars.
[deleted] t1_ixerno0 wrote
[deleted]
NorseTikiBar t1_ixesb4l wrote
Uh huh. That is definitely something you've seen because it's so commonplace. Sure.
[deleted] t1_ixey92c wrote
[deleted]
NorseTikiBar t1_ixf13lh wrote
LOL, the time range of these links is 7 years. Yep, so commonplace.
[deleted] t1_ixf1tba wrote
[deleted]
NorseTikiBar t1_ixf5w6c wrote
I support you getting your head checked if you think anyone can eat a train.
Spring_breaaaaak t1_ixfmf9g wrote
sips tea
Here4thebeer3232 t1_ixg8kl7 wrote
You're statistically more likely to be seriously injured or killed while driving. But hey, what do statistics know
AGR_51A004M t1_ixeef89 wrote
Sure, because cars drive themselves around for fun.
Fuzzy_Win8285 t1_ixehmd0 wrote
The point is that the way we build cities reflects our priorities and values. If you begin with the premise that everyone will have a car and use it as their primary means of transportation, then you end up with a city that is very different (in my view worse) than if you begin with the premise that cities should be enjoyable for the people who live and work in them, and navigable without the use of a car.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments