Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Estoril_BlueM3 t1_j1amyek wrote

It looks specific with references to violations and terms that allow the eviction. The lawful (legal) original lease supersedes any sublease. Not that it really matters (it doesn't), but did the sublease (yes, I know you say it wasn't a legal one) have anything to say on the subject? Are the passages cited in the eviction notice accurate?

If you are on an unapproved sub-lease, I doubt you have anything protecting you.

−10

lolahey OP t1_j1arpbl wrote

The lease says that either party can terminate with a 30 day notice.

3

VoodooGirl47 t1_j1c1q85 wrote

So from what I've read, it sounds like someone gave the other notice. While you should easily be able to fight this at least temporarily, you should definitely consider whether it's best for you to do so, especially if they had given you notice and you weren't compliant to the sublease that you signed with the master tenant.

We definitely aren't hearing the full story even from just your side of things, so there is absolutely nothing that we could even help point out to you. Just call the OTA.

2

LegitimateFail3 t1_j1esrcw wrote

Unilaterally? Usually it says that it has to be mutually agreed in writing yada yada. Regardless, there's lots of things in leases that aren't legal. CALL OTA IMMEDIATELY.

1