Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

klappstuhlgeneral OP t1_je4hp1s wrote

>I wouldn't expect any officialist party to oppose NATO whims

Are you sure you're parsing the situation right here?

Dead-in-the-head NATO (Macron) won't see any opposition from "officialist" (whatever that is) parties? Yeah, right - Schröder and Scholz, also known as the "Bloodhounds of the West".

While the US needs to be cajoled to send a couple of tanks? And there is 0 NATO involvement whatsoever (granted there is involvement from countries that ARE IN NATO - but that's kinda hard to avoid here, point in case).

With that cooperation in Iraq and Afg (esp the departure) it should be clear to everyone that everyone is just a US pawn here... /s

Your reading of the situation is about as accurate as Putin's here I think.

If you think the green party position "rhetoric" is "funny", maybe should try reading some first hand information on their thoughts and principles then?

2

lorbd t1_je4j8g9 wrote

>And there is 0 NATO involvement whatsoever

Elemayo

−4

hh3k0 t1_je4svhh wrote

If NATO would’ve gotten involved it really would’ve been a 3-day special military operation, just not how Russia pictured it.

4