Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Desurvivedsignator t1_iudbcky wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Cathay Pacific to Restore Some Flights Using Russian Airspace by kneehigsock

The Russian Federation is the legal successor to the Soviet Union, so they were right about that.

The BUK that shot down Malaysia 370 was supplied by Russia to troops that were fighting on Russian orders, with Russian personnel among them and with direct support from the Kremlin. That goalpost has been moved a couple of centimeters, if at all.

9

Usual-Limit6396 t1_iudbgaq wrote

Legal smeagol, let’s be honest. And centimeters are centimeters, trust me. I’m a jelqer. Be honest! Ukraine Slava!

−8

Desurvivedsignator t1_iudgh39 wrote

I'm honest.

Dishonest is claiming that the Russians didn't have their finger on the trigger when MH370 was shot down.

It's also dishonest to claim that the USSR and the RF are two different entities. Heck, even Putin would dispute that!

5

Usual-Limit6396 t1_iudgppf wrote

Wrong. You are just making stuff up. It’s just like when it was reported about Russians paying for bounties in US soldiers in Afghanistan. Everyone believed it and reported it because, “it’s ok to be racist against Russians.”

As for USSR and Russia I don’t agree with Putin on pretty much everything, so appealing to your daddy won’t do any good with me!

Be honest. Let’s kick their asses, but let’s make sure it’s via truth and not assumptions with no proof! (That rhymed making it double effective! Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦

Then, when we win, let’s help them build back better, too. So this never ever happens again. Stop the hate. Live in truth.

−1

Desurvivedsignator t1_iue890n wrote

You're insinuating that Putin's "my daddy", but are following the Russian propaganda's talking points to the letter, e.g. with the "anti-russian racism" bit.

Care to explain where I'm wrong? Where did the BUK come from?

3