Grig134 t1_iu0ilo2 wrote
Reply to comment by FeckThul in SNP minister resigns over gender recognition plans by VORTXS
Lol, good to know you don't have any concerns. Odd that you decided to comment anyway.
> I’m familiar with the debate however
Yes, the debate is to vaguely allude to trans people being rapists, attempt to ban them from shelters, and then backtrack if called out. I too am familiar with the debate.
FeckThul t1_iu0iszx wrote
It’s unfortunate that you’re ignoring 99% of what I’m writing in favor of sentence fragments and whatever you believed coming into this.
Grig134 t1_iu0j8ma wrote
You quoted a section of the article saying there were concerns with the law. When asked about it you said you have no concerns and don't know what they would be. You're so obvious disingenuous it's hilarious.
FeckThul t1_iu0jnji wrote
Believe it or not, acting in bad faith because you assume I must be too is not really the basis for anything constructive.
Grig134 t1_iu0kljg wrote
Then make a point. What are your "concerns"?
FeckThul t1_iu0kxmt wrote
When did I say that I have concerns? I quoted an article in which people who are not me expressed concerns, I can’t read their minds.
Grig134 t1_iu0m8kt wrote
> I can’t read their minds.
But you can read their statements. This is a "destruction of women's rights" according to JK Rowling, one "concerned" individual mentioned. You did read the article I'm guessing because you managed to quote part of it.
FeckThul t1_iu0mg5p wrote
JK Rowling can blow it out of her many gaping sphincters, and the existence of transphobes like her doesn’t invalidate the concerns of women who aren’t scumbags.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments