Comments
piskoargs t1_iuhmzar wrote
> Russian soldiers aren't all the brightest.
Its not just the soldiers, even their precision guided munitions has shit accuracy rate
thejml2000 t1_iuhnsb2 wrote
This reminds me of the Precision vs Accuracy definition.
A rocket is precise if it can hit the same spot over and over. It’s accurate if it can hit close to the target over and over (think shotgun). You kinda need both.
axonxorz t1_iuigocv wrote
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or a deviation.
the_real_abraham t1_iuj58z3 wrote
A missile is never late, nor is it early. It arrives precisely when it means to.
BobbyMcPrescott t1_iujupgv wrote
This is dictated in military time as hi:mar:s
710AlpacaBowl t1_iuijvab wrote
Ah yes, the catch 22 law of advanced ballistics
Randomthought5678 t1_iuk8i5z wrote
Copy pasta: Accuracy is how close a value is to its true value. An example is how close an arrow gets to the bull's-eye center. Precision is how repeatable a measurement is. An example is how close a second arrow is to the first one (regardless of whether either is near the mark).
[deleted] t1_iuiqtnp wrote
[deleted]
frizzykid t1_iuhov7l wrote
Russia/nato have accidentally shot at each other before and even shot down planes but under murky enough waters no one feels like there is any significant need to retaliate. If a rocket hit the center of Berlin and it caused a mass casualty crisis, I'd be worried. But a malfunctioning rocket hitting a tree in the middle of some woods which is the far more likely outcome is not a big enough deal that nato would start considering article v
ThrowAway_PFC220919 t1_iuhpzjx wrote
I would tend to agree. A missile hitting a random forest 150kms from the nearest city is not likely to be cause for a full-blown conventional strike on Russia. Especially where the missile was shot down by UA forces. However, (and I'll note Moldova is not a NATO member), striking assets near the border of Ukraine, where the neighbouring country also has important asset is a recipe for disaster.
Moldova has a damn about 10km from where the Russian missile was shot down.
DeliciousTruck t1_iui1knl wrote
There is and shouldn't be a leeway on where an explosive hits. An attack is an attack and if you brush it off as only an accident you are not only showing weakness but also giving russians room to actually hit infrastructure under the guise of some bullshit and just claim it was an accident.
France and the UK already tried an appeasment policy against Germany right before the second world war, hoping to avoid another war.
I'm against any war but there has to be a clear line with zero leeway.
[deleted] t1_iuin6uv wrote
[removed]
Skaindire t1_iuiapvb wrote
Right you are, but these fuckwits threatened to use nukes, their collateral damage is a lot higher than a few cubic meters of wood.
Rogermcfarley t1_iuiae4s wrote
This kind of incident isn't going to trigger Article 5.
Top_Environment9897 t1_iuielx1 wrote
NATO is not controlled by a machine, but by a group of people. Most of them aren't going to war just because of an accidental missile.
[deleted] t1_iuhxyqe wrote
[removed]
Extension_Bat_4945 t1_iuhz1wb wrote
They already did on July 17, 2014. Nothing happened afterwards so don’t worry.
Arkane-Light t1_iuhmfey wrote
From the article:
"A Russian rocket fell in the village of Naslavcea, in the Ocnita District in the north of Moldova, in the morning of 31 October.
Source: European Pravda, quoting the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova
The ministry noted that a rocket, shot down by the Ukrainian air defence system, fell on the northern part of the village of Naslavcea, located near the border with Ukraine."
Sunshinehaiku t1_iuhrbu2 wrote
My heart for the Moldovan people. The poorest and most vulnerable country on the continent.
Fox_Kurama t1_iuk8hjx wrote
The guys who fired the missile may soon take that honor.
[deleted] t1_iuionwl wrote
[deleted]
aaaaaaaarrrrrgh t1_iuispbl wrote
"Hey Ukraine, I've got something itchy on my Transnistria, can you please scratch it?"
bonderav t1_iujkv1b wrote
And just north poland sits disappointed that it did not land at them. They are looking for any excuse to bloody russians nose
pp_Barnacle69666 t1_iuip96f wrote
The Russian soldiers firing rockets are probably illiterated
turboNOMAD t1_iujwvy6 wrote
And also becoming obliterated.
[deleted] t1_iuhm7r3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuiemzh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuign0v wrote
[deleted]
Heavy-Birthday-4972 t1_iujif4r wrote
The Russians have done it now, no one messes with Moldova, or knows where it is.
cameraman502 t1_iuj876x wrote
Quick, Romania needs to annex Moldova (we know you both want to) and see if we can't do a quick ex-post facto Article 5.
Floofyboy t1_iuhmm98 wrote
This is one of my potential fears, a missile hitting NATO by accident... Russian soldiers aren't all the brightest.