Floofyboy
Floofyboy t1_jcn8pyg wrote
Reply to comment by nybbleth in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
I tested it only once with gpt4 cuz I found a free site that let u test a single request....
Floofyboy t1_jclust8 wrote
Reply to comment by MassiveIndependence8 in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
The riddle where you have 2 chickens and a dog that needs to cross a river and u can't leave the dog with a chicken.
However i was not able to test it a tons since i dont have gptplus.
Floofyboy t1_jchn74l wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
> So I’ve recently joined this subreddit, around the time chat gpt was released and first came into the public eye. Since then I’ve been lurking and trying to stay up to date but honestly get lost in the sauce. I don’t really understand the scope of this AI and techno stuff going on.
Can you actually read text?
He first says he got interested because of chatGPT and then says he doesn't understand the scope of it. I gave explanations about the scope of chatGPT. you are free to disagree and think chatGPT is ASI but in this case give arguments instead of using personnal attacks.
Floofyboy t1_jch94yn wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
not sure what's up with the personnal attacks but OP mentionned chatGPT and asked if it might lead to utopian “possibilities”, you replied with some videos talking about ASI, i wanted to clarify the GPT models are very unlikely to lead to that.
Floofyboy t1_jch6hf9 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
GPT4 is not anywhere close to AGI and certainly not ASI. It cannot even solve basic riddles a children could solve.
It think its a fantastic tool for creative content (making stories, brainstorming ideas, etc), its a cool tool to help devs, and its an interesting alternative to classical search engines.
But people saying its going to help us fix climate changes and achieve immortality are wrong imo.
Floofyboy t1_jc5ir9w wrote
Reply to AI with built-in bias toward one nationality or regional group could lead to absolute misery and death. by yougoigofuego
I mean it looks like current AIs are purposely being fed bias. The bias does not come from the actual model, but from the programmers imposing their own bias. If you use uncensored AIs this issue does not happen.
Essentially when you ask chatGPT to make a nice poem about a controversial politician and it says "as a language model i can't its offensive" and then it does it for a less controversial politician, that's bias which was pushed by the programmers.
Floofyboy t1_ixruhrl wrote
Reply to comment by HackMeBackInTime in Quebec government to appeal racial profiling ruling that banned random police stops by applepiebae
The analogy is not perfect because on many other issues Québec is one of the most progressive of Canada, for things like gun control, health care, tuiton costs, gay rights, etc. But we have an unique reality that our language is in danger and sometimes our government overreact in dumb ways.
Floofyboy t1_iuhmm98 wrote
This is one of my potential fears, a missile hitting NATO by accident... Russian soldiers aren't all the brightest.
Floofyboy t1_iu4zz1n wrote
> The two ministers also discussed the “issue of not allowing the use of weapons of mass destruction”, spokesperson Wang said, adding that China “…believes that further escalation of the situation should be avoided to prevent a humanitarian disaster”.
I mean, i guess China is evil but not insane, that's a good thing i guess?
Having a dialogue is a good thing the issue is Russia never really wanted to negotiate, all they proposed was extremely one sided deals. If they really want a dialogue they need to show they are willing to compromise more than they were before.
Floofyboy t1_jcpacmn wrote
Reply to comment by nybbleth in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
Poe.com