Submitted by Substantial_Camera_8 t3_yii53k in worldnews
Comments
elcrack0r t1_iuirsbj wrote
What's your thought process? Are you afraid that your Apple product will become more expensive?
theassassintherapist t1_iuis3y4 wrote
You make it sound like trying to prevent thousands from dying in dense cities is a bad thing. Lives are more important than the economy.
DCrichieelias79 t1_iuiscxx wrote
Its allowing a new level of control over their citizens; what they are able to do, where they are able to go. It even allows control over various factions within the CCP: toe the line or else we will lock down your city.
It may or may not be the reason for the zero covid policy, but they are absolutely exploiting it to maximize control.
Substantial_Camera_8 OP t1_iuisgqq wrote
You cant lock down forever,
its proven that COVID will be with us
How about vaccination their population?
MoodApart4755 t1_iuishxc wrote
They’re leaving so they don’t get locked in the factory for an indefinite period by authorities
Substantial_Camera_8 OP t1_iuiso3u wrote
They just locked down people inside a Shanghai disneyland
My thought process is that its not functional, either they dont trust their own vaccine or they like the control they have on the citizens
You cant lock down forever
lollysticky t1_iuisu6u wrote
That comment says more about you than OP... And it's a legitimate question to raise: why does China continue this policy that clearly isn't working (as they continue to shut down cities) and also hurts them economically.
attackofthetominator t1_iuiswn6 wrote
If lives were important to the CCP they would've taken the western vaccines instead of their mediocre off-brand version.
[deleted] t1_iuit828 wrote
You've got to have the worst public policy team on planet earth to believe 100% lockdowns and 0% tolerance is going to do anything after looking at the data. Covid is here to stay, and locking people inside does absolutely nothing when you live in a globalized economy with open trade borders.
MalikTheHalfBee t1_iuitcyg wrote
Probably that totalitarianism is bad. But you may disagree.
autotldr t1_iuito3g wrote
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 80%. (I'm a bot)
> Videos circulating on Chinese social media platforms showed people who are allegedly Foxconn workers climbing over fences and carrying their belongings down the road. The Foxconn plant in Zhengzhou, Henan province, is one of the largest factories in China that assembles products for Apple Inc., including its latest iPhone 14 devices.
> The workers' exodus comes after reports that Foxconn had placed a number of workers under quarantine following a COVID-19 outbreak in the factory.
> The Foxconn facility in Zhengzhou can accommodate up to 350,000 factory workers, but it is not clear how many are currently employed by the factory.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Workers^#1 Foxconn^#2 factory^#3 Zhengzhou^#4 facility^#5
attackofthetominator t1_iuiu623 wrote
Because the Sinovac is not as effective as West's vaccines. Combine that with yet another Covid outbreak and China's healthcare system gets overrun again.
lollysticky t1_iuiuuw0 wrote
I would imagine China's vaccines have improved by now, no?
attackofthetominator t1_iuivrot wrote
Apparently not if they're enforcing complete lockdowns of anyplace where there's a remote trace of Covid.
ItchyK t1_iuiwjde wrote
This is the answer, it's not about public safety. They have proven time and time again that they don't care about people at all.
It allowed them to go full dystopic authoritarian. No one can start thinking shit if you lock/weld them and their families inside for an indefinite amount of time.
theassassintherapist t1_iuj071p wrote
Just this week, 2,649 Americans died to covid. Last week, 2,591 died. And that's with the "superior" western vaccine and sparsely packed cities.
Which means even with better vaccines, the death in China could be tens of thousands per week if they were to lax restrictions. How is that even remotely acceptable?
[deleted] t1_iuj0w76 wrote
never heard of Mao Zedong? The Chinese gov is not one to state they're wrong.
elcrack0r t1_iuj1hah wrote
I don't. What are you venting about? If you're doing business with a totalitarian state, you always should expect totalitarian moves.
elcrack0r t1_iuj1lzn wrote
Honey bear can do anything he likes.
[deleted] t1_iuj1tj3 wrote
elcrack0r t1_iuj2al6 wrote
I'm just asking a question. China is a zero tolerance state. Doesn't matter who is getting hurt. OP is saying, oh noes, a Apple factory in China closed. Who tf cares?
Wild-Thymes t1_iuj2elk wrote
May I ask among those 2649 US fatalities, what are the percentage of the unvaccinated?
Dapper-Award4395 t1_iuj3xgy wrote
Unfortunately the lockdowns just delay the issue. COVID is endemic. It's here to stay.
theassassintherapist t1_iuj3zgd wrote
No, you may not. You're going to have to ask the CDC that.
SentientHotdogWater t1_iuj59u9 wrote
>Lives are more important than the economy.
True, but surely they could just use mRNA vaccines and re-open just like every other country on the planet at this point?...
SentientHotdogWater t1_iuj5os2 wrote
Because admitting they were wrong about zero-covid and relying on western mRNA vaccines would cause the Chinese government to lose face.
theassassintherapist t1_iuj63fc wrote
America is still looking at 2k+ deaths weekly even with mRNA vaccine and sparsely populated cities. Triple the population and pack the cities tighter and the weekly death count suddenly don't seem that acceptable.
SentientHotdogWater t1_iuj70jb wrote
COVID deaths in the US and the rest of the world are overwhelmingly among the unvaccinated (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~50%2B).
If the goal was truly to reduce deaths why not import mRNA vaccines in addition to lockdowns? Would that not logically be the best decision if all they care about is keeping the death count down? Why keep out the most effective vaccines?
Wild-Thymes t1_iuj77gl wrote
From the cdc page you provided , 7.3% of the deaths were people with booster shot. Meaning, 92.7% of the people who lost their lives were those who either did not have access to vaccines or did not take the doses as recommended.
in your previous comment, you said that the US had high fatalities even with western vaccines, which was supposed to be “superior” (your word). This official statistics shows otherwise.
Wild-Thymes t1_iuj8f85 wrote
You are right. Covid fatalities in the US are overwhelmingly among those who did not have access to vaccines or those who did not take the doses. CDC data showed 92.7% of covid deaths were among said people.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends_weeklydeaths_select_00
The guy you replied to has been trying hard to push for a fallacy in order to justify beijing
lollysticky t1_iujpkyf wrote
You're correct there. But they tend to like economic growth
lollysticky t1_iujppmu wrote
You apparently
lollysticky t1_iujpukd wrote
The question is: are the quarantines for that reason, or something else?
TSL4me t1_iuk0a8v wrote
DIBE25 t1_iukbfvd wrote
if you're talking of shitty authoritarian regimes then a logic like theirs works
you quarantine entire cities at a time, push spyware to your citizens and monitor their every move and while you're at it you can keep gathering more information (other than for prosecution and profiling idk for what) and not have to worry about having a working vaccine
or something idk
Substantial_Camera_8 OP t1_iuirh8w wrote
Torpedo your own economy? Why?
Sinovac isnt as effective?
Like the level of control?
Can quarantine any company at any time to get back at US?
I just dont get the thought process