Comments
quiplaam t1_iuhut1n wrote
Energy sources are generally considered valid military targets. Since they are used by both civilians and military forces they can be targeted. While there have been war crimes committed by Russia, these are attacks are not and acting like any attack is a war crime / terrorism diminishes their meaning.
Dead_Optics t1_iuhnugz wrote
Is this a political or an ideological aim? In my mind war doesn’t fall into ether of those categories.
Arkane-Light t1_iuho5bu wrote
Both, in the case of how Russia sees this war.
Putin has repeated many times in the first months of the war at public rallies in Moscow that he wanted to "Re-conquer all former Soviet territories starting with Ukraine" and justified the invasion with the rhetoric of "Russia created Ukraine, it is our duty to make that country ours". Plus a load of paranoia-infused insanity he spouted.
Dead_Optics t1_iuhoyug wrote
That’s kinda my point the war is being fought for land rather than an ideology. While yes some of ghe rhetoric used in the justification would suggest this was an ideological war we know that’s false and the real reason is land.
DuncanConnell t1_iui11he wrote
War itself is literally a terrorist act. There's no situation at any point in world history where an offensive war is not terroristic--even if it is persecuted against nations committing genocide, to that nation (now fighting defensively) those invading are the terrorists who are attacking and trying to force an ideology counter to the nation's owns.
Just because "the real reason is land" doesn't mean there's not ideological and political aims for it.
^(Below is written from a propagandist POV and literally every single one of them can be conflated with "land". I) ^(don't) ^(believe any of these beyond the fact that this is what Russia has stated and tells its people.)
- Ideological
- Rid Ukraine of control by Nazi Government and stop the murder/genocide occurring against the Russian demographics in Luhansk/Donetsk
- Reclaim parts of "historical Russia" prior to its breakup with the fall of the USSR (viewpoint that Russa = USSR borders) and restore cultural ties and security for the Russian people
- (Geo)Political
- Prevent the Eastward expansion of the EU and NATO to ensure greater border security amid the last few turbulent years after successive impacts against the economy, demographics within Russia, and the upsetting of the world interconnectivity due to COVID restrictions.
- Ensure greater presence within Europe and create a convex borderline to provide both greater pressure against European nations as well as greater security for Russian allies (Belarus, Transnistria, Turkey, etc).
- Economic
- Gain access to Ukraines large deposits of natural gas as well as secure control of Crimea as well as control a larger portion of the Black Sea, allowing greater shipping access and naval security.
- Prevent interference by world markets in isolating Russia by allowing easier access to African and Mediterranean allies as well as improving trade accessibility to Southern European markets.
Even if Russia outright said "we are invading to claim the gas fields to increase Putin's profits" there's still an ideological bent to it.
Mountain_Offer1348 t1_iuho92l wrote
You don’t think war is used to advance political and ideological goals??
Dead_Optics t1_iuhoe1o wrote
By that definition every country who’s ever waged war are terrorists at which point the term losses it’s meaning.
ChaosDancer t1_iuhu24w wrote
Ye when the US was bombing Iraq and Afghanistan there were no ideological or political goals present, so i guess the people that died in those places should have been happy they weren't killed by terrorists.
Dead_Optics t1_iuhuqxm wrote
Sick strawman. The argument I’m making is that terrorism is a fairly specific thing and that by broadening the scope of what makes something terrorism it will lose its meaning.
iglidante t1_iuioixt wrote
> By that definition every country who’s ever waged war are terrorists at which point the term losses it’s meaning.
I mean, if a country wages an offensive war against another country that hasn't first attacked them or an ally (so, there is no defensive component) - how can you say they are not acting as terrorists? War is fundamentally immoral for most people, barring specific exceptions.
[deleted] t1_iui9ulv wrote
[deleted]
Slacker256 t1_iuhij8w wrote
Umm, they shot down 44 of 50 missiles but remaining six somehow hit 18 targets? Do they have separating warheads or something? *sarcasm, obviously*
Fit-Somewhere1827 t1_iuhluw5 wrote
Kharkiv region was hit by S-300 missiles, not the cruise missiles. Hence the difference.
Th3Wayfarer t1_iuhrd51 wrote
They also use suicide drones, a lot of them. Missiles are high priority targets, so more drones get through.
AntiDantii t1_iuhrtqu wrote
Well this site is a Ukrainian propaganda mill so take it with a large grain of salt.
kimchifreeze t1_iuimhpi wrote
>Rockets and drones
>44 of the more than 50 missiles
Are drones a type of missile? 🤔
HarakenQQ OP t1_iuhgfs8 wrote
For everyone who can and wants to help Ukraine bring victory closer - State site where you can donate directly to Ukraine
AirDusst t1_iuhusnq wrote
The Putin Nazis think they can shoot their bad quality missiles and this will make the Ukrainian people want to end the war.
Yet again, the Putin Nazis are totally wrong. These war crimes will only make the Ukrainian will for total victory that much stronger.
grrrown t1_iuirv2q wrote
Russian Nazis
[deleted] t1_iuhj254 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iujmqko wrote
>44 of the more than 50 missiles fired at our territory were shot down.
>
>Rockets and drones, launched by Russians on Monday, struck 10 oblasts and damaged 18 targets, most of which are energy facilities.
drone and rocket statistics, please!
What kind of infrastructure is oblast? What happened to the other 8 targets?
d4dog t1_iujtt5w wrote
Russia better hope that Ukraine doesn't get their hands on any long range rocketry. They have an awful lot of payback to collect.
gentleman_snake t1_iuhtkq5 wrote
Well, there is a surprising amount of valuable structures in Russia too. Be a shame if something were to happen to them...
Arkane-Light t1_iuhk1on wrote
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/Factsheet32EN.pdf
"Terrorism is commonly understood to refer to acts of violence that target civilians in the pursuit of political or ideological aims"
The General Assembly’s Declaration on Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism, set out in its resolution 49/60, stated that terrorism includes “criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes”
Russia IS a Terrorist State.