Submitted by The_Food_Scientist t3_z8rs07 in worldnews
BKStephens t1_iyf2ko1 wrote
Reply to comment by deletable666 in Letter bomb explodes in Ukranian embassy in Madrid by The_Food_Scientist
casualty noun (INJURED)
a person injured or killed in a serious accident or war
Serious being the operative word here.
deletable666 t1_iyf332y wrote
Lmao. You are a trip dude. Doubling down instead of just admitting you were confused. Take care fellow. Bless your heart
BKStephens t1_iyf3ofv wrote
If you read the full thread you can quite clearly see where I admitted my confusion and what it was about.
It was not about what "casualty" means.
deletable666 t1_iyf3x8m wrote
Clearly you still have some confusion on what a casualty is, and there is no reason for me to read through all your other replies to other comments I am not involved in.
Take care, goodbye
BKStephens t1_iyf4qkb wrote
No confusion. I even Googled it like you advised, and put it right there for you to read.
Or is there no reason for you to read through all my replies? Even if they're directly to you?
wrosecrans t1_iyfc8rd wrote
In the phrase "serious accident" the adjective serious modifies the noun accident.
Are you saying somebody accidentally sent a letter bomb?
teaklog2 t1_iyfd6lv wrote
Going to jump in and argue the grammar here specifically, in an ‘or’ statement like that the ‘serious’ can also modify both things being listed.
‘i want to buy a red car or truck’ does not imply you want a red car or any colored truck
‘an accretive merger or acquisition’ - doesn’t imply you don’t care if the acquisition is accretive or not
unless you are saying if you want to say ‘I want to buy a red car, table, blanket, and shirt!’ you should instead say ‘i want to buy a red car, a red table, a red blanket, and a red shirt!’
if you want to remove that assumption from your sentence, you could instead say ‘a truck or a red car’ or ‘a red car or any colored truck.’
wrosecrans t1_iyfejq3 wrote
In that case, the reading is that a wartime casualty can only happen in a "serious war," and someone killed in a minor border conflict wouldn't count as a casualty. Is that a reasonable reading of the definition?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments