[deleted] t1_ixpdqw2 wrote
Fun fact: India has never invaded another country.
Acrobatic_Video_6770 t1_ixpn9tc wrote
hope india learns some of invasion stuff from german friends
itsgolday t1_ixqzvy5 wrote
Late to the party but how about Operation Polo or the Siachen conflict? Genuine question here, I don’t know anything about India.
[deleted] t1_ixr2jch wrote
[deleted]
Huge-Physics5491 t1_ixt11ai wrote
Heard about the Cholas?
[deleted] t1_ixt24n1 wrote
What about them?
Huge-Physics5491 t1_ixt4iwg wrote
They invaded Southeast Asia
[deleted] t1_ixt4tq4 wrote
Did that happen before India’s independence and founding as a nation in 1947?
Huge-Physics5491 t1_ixt4xsy wrote
Well, after founding, most countries haven't invaded their neighbours
[deleted] t1_ixt5f4b wrote
That’s the whole point of my original comment, that India has not invaded another sovereign country since its founding in 1947.
Mammoth_Cut5134 t1_ixtr74y wrote
Invasion is a strong word. Maybe they migrated?
[deleted] t1_ixugqxa wrote
I mean that was the exception, not the norm. I don't think there was any other dynastic in all of Indian history that had led massive invasions anywhere outside the subcontinent.
no1bullshitguy t1_ixtf4qh wrote
India although have annexed its state of Goa though. But that was when Portuguese were not ready to let it go
throawayacc1984 t1_ixtnljb wrote
Goa was a colony, its people were fighting for freedom, and india only intervened after the dictator of Portugal flat out refused to even discuss granting independence to Goa.
[deleted] t1_ixthc2z wrote
Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ, everyone is going on about Goa as if it’s a sovereign country.
limitbreaksolidus t1_ixri3wc wrote
bangladesh, sikkim, Goa, pakistan, kashmir and china say hi
throawayacc1984 t1_ixrt93b wrote
>bangladesh
Intervention to stop a genocide that too only after west pakistan attacked India first.
>sikkim
Referendum
>Goa
Emancipation of a colony after Portugal refused to grant freedom.
>pakistan
Dude Pakistan is the one who's started every single one of the wars! Even neutral sources agree on this.
>kashmir
Pakistan invaded kashmir first, and the Indian military only entered kashmir after the king signed the instrument of accession, thus legally making kashmir a state in the Indian union.
>china
Is that supposed to be a joke? China is the one who invaded Tibet in the first place! They were the ones who then invaded and captured parts of the state of Arunachal pradesh, claiming it as a part of South Tibet.
Mammoth_Cut5134 t1_ixtr8ys wrote
This is what my last braincell feels like.
Exotic_Conclusion_21 t1_ixr4042 wrote
They invaded Hyderabad and goa
[deleted] t1_ixr57fu wrote
I wasn’t aware Hyderabad and Goa weren’t located in India. /s
Exotic_Conclusion_21 t1_ixr71u0 wrote
Quit down voting me for 0 reason. Portugal owned Goa, making it Portuguese land which was in fact a sovereign nation. Hyderabad was an independent princely state for aprox a year before India took it. Both were not owned by India, but India invaded both and conquered both. Also, imo the intervention in Sri Lanka as well as east pakistan(bangladesh) were both invasions as well.
iSpeakFaxxx123 t1_ixst9n2 wrote
Sovereign land by force you mean
Exotic_Conclusion_21 t1_ixr6ci4 wrote
They weren't before India took both
[deleted] t1_ixr6hbj wrote
They weren’t sovereign countries either.
godmadetexas t1_ixpg9gg wrote
Define “invaded”. They have done expeditionary actions in the Maldives, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. None of them were long-lasting invasions, but two of them resulted in regime changes - albeit popular ones.
International-Fall49 t1_ixphi46 wrote
We liberated bangladesh when they were being buttfucked by pakis and ur beloved USA under Nixon and Kissinger was supporting that genocide .
Indian armed forces were in Dhaka when pakis surrendered . We have given their freedom how many other countries wud have done that
[deleted] t1_ixpi5sf wrote
[removed]
International-Fall49 t1_ixpifjh wrote
O sorry master ,how dare i a indian a third worlder dare to have a different opinion than urs even tho fact r on my side .
[deleted] t1_ixph9mz wrote
Unprompted military aggression against another country, not in response to that country’s military actions against India or neighboring country.
Hope that helps!
godmadetexas t1_ixphoin wrote
No, none of that.
[deleted] t1_ixpigb4 wrote
[deleted]
_karma_bitch t1_ixpfa9x wrote
Wrong Present day Bangladesh 1971 sri Lanka civil war
throawayacc1984 t1_ixpfugg wrote
1)India intervened in Bangladesh on the request of the Mukti bahini to stop the ongoing genocide, and that too only after west pakistan attacked India first, so it's not an invasion.
2)Indian intervention in Sri Lanka also only happened after the sri lankan government asked india to intervene, so again not an invasion.
International-Fall49 t1_ixphcat wrote
We helped bangladeshi in there fight against a genocidal force.
angelowner t1_ixphq8v wrote
*helped bangladeshi people liberate themselves.
International-Fall49 t1_ixpjtc8 wrote
Edited
Five__Stars t1_ixpff9z wrote
Also Goa.
[deleted] t1_ixpfhux wrote
Goa isn’t a country
Five__Stars t1_ixpfmm3 wrote
Portugal then.
throawayacc1984 t1_ixpfw6u wrote
Goa is a part of India, it was a Portugese colony. So it wasn't an invasion.
[deleted] t1_ixpfp8v wrote
India didn’t invade Portugal
[deleted] t1_ixpq8vg wrote
[removed]
Five__Stars t1_ixpuq7a wrote
You can think whatever you want about it and that's your right but it was internationally recognised as Portugese territory and therefore from a technical standpoint it was an invasion. I'm not making any pretense on the righteousness of that move.
[deleted] t1_ixpuwut wrote
[deleted]
Five__Stars t1_ixpvuf0 wrote
No? Per international law they are recognised as part of Ukraine.
International-Fall49 t1_ixph8bh wrote
colonial apologist
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments