frosthowler t1_j23lya1 wrote
Reply to comment by metametapraxis in Jordan king warns of 'red lines' in Jerusalem as Netanyahu returns to office by Pilast
Netanyahu is not a right-wing extremist. Israel is a parliamentary democracy, so parties must create coalitions that encapsulate as many parties as needed to take a majority of parliament.
Netanyahu is being boycotted by his traditional partners, the center & center-right.His partners are the religious parties (which aren't politically right or left, they are socially right) and the far right parties (which are politically hard right and socially not necessarily left or right--usually left).
So the problem is Netanyahu is selling out the country by creating a government consisting entirely of political fringes of society (except the Arab parties) + Likud, which is a center-right party. As far as politics go, it is equivalent to the Democrats in policy. Parties to the left of him are simply much more left than the Democrats.
1dererLives t1_j242i81 wrote
>which aren't politically right or left, they are socially right
So politically right then, because they're politicians.
frosthowler t1_j243t1w wrote
I understand your comprehension of political ideologies is single-dimensional and tunneled, but please at least try to educate yourself.
You may start your reading here on socially left ideologies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism
And here's socially right ideologies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservatism
As far as politically left or right, that means in reference to the state's notion of left/right politics. In Israel, politically, alternative left is reserved for jihadists and other anti-Zionists, the left is reserved for the Zionist peace-optimistic camp, the right is reserved for the Zionist peace-pessimistic camp, and the alternative right is reserved for the pro-settlements camp.
As you may guess--or not, considering your comment leaves little hopes in that respect--this spectrum of left to right in no way corresponds to the ideologies professed by social liberalism or conservatism. A different order is required in order to redistribute those camps across a social liberalism/conservatism spectrum. And, indeed, split them up into new camps completely, as there are communists in the same camp as the jihadists, which are very much incompatible ideologies.
Many 'left-wing' politicians are socially conservatist and many 'right-wing' politicians are socially liberal.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments