Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

autotldr t1_j2d0mrd wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)


> The Palestinians on Saturday welcomed a vote by the United Nations General Assembly requesting that the International Court of Justice provide an opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.

> Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem - areas the Palestinians want for a state - in a 1967 war.

> Senior Palestinian official Hussein al-Sheikh said on Twitter that the vote "Reflects the victory of Palestinian diplomacy." There were 87 members who voted in favour of adopting the request; Israel, the United States and 24 other members voted against; and 53 abstained.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Israel^#1 Palestinian^#2 vote^#3 state^#4 West^#5

4

adchait t1_j2dgmar wrote

You're confusing the International Criminal Court (ICC) with International Court of Justice (ICJ). Here the UN general assembly has asked ICJ to give a legal opinion (not start a trial against Israel) and all UN members are automatically party to the court, including Israel.

In 2003, UNGA has asked for a legal opinion on Israel's wall in Palestinian territories. ICJ ruled that it had jurisdiction, whether Israel liked it or not.

5

Skydreamer6 t1_j2dr05w wrote

"There were 87 members who voted in favour of adopting the request; Israel, the United States and 24 other members voted against; and 53 abstained"

3

dubiousadvocate t1_j2f139a wrote

One way to not lose land in a war is to not start a war for land.

16