Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Rogermcfarley t1_j1iw8rz wrote

They've levelled the place so they'll just capture a lost city. Complete waste of time and resources for the Russians.

20

UncleBenji t1_j1ix60c wrote

Exactly but Ukraine can’t afford to let them capture it and use that area as a spearhead to push into Ukraine again. As long as the Wagner’s keep throwing bodies at it, Bakhmut will continue to be a blood bath.

25

scummy_shower_stall t1_j1jypq8 wrote

It’s higher ground literally. So yes, it does have strategic value unfortunately.

7

ReneDeGames t1_j1l8kqx wrote

Only in a local sense, most of the value of taking it is the ability to then attack a pair of larger cites deeper within Ukraine, but as you may notice, if you struggling to take a small village, you will have an even harder time taking larger cities, with even worse supply lines.

3

[deleted] t1_j1k4o4x wrote

[deleted]

1

Aurora_Fatalis t1_j1kdn8y wrote

> we aren't fighting with arrows anymore

We are, however, still fighting with javelins.

18

scummy_shower_stall t1_j1k6j04 wrote

True on the arrows, lol! But there have been some very good analyses on why Bakhmut is important, having to do with logistics. I also remember that if Ukraine falls back, it is a pretty sizable loss of territory which would make it that much harder to win back.

2