Submitted by secure_caramel t3_10ksvnc in worldnews
Comments
[deleted] t1_j5smr94 wrote
[removed]
jellyvish t1_j5smxm0 wrote
i thought this was known for a while... they don't let their employees pee and they are forced to work during tornadoes
cesiuum t1_j5sn1xh wrote
It's Amazon. Warehouse workers are treated like dirt. However people still admire how Bezos is so successful.
Cat_stacker t1_j5sncny wrote
Robots are way more expensive to replace.
autotldr t1_j5sncz9 wrote
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 91%. (I'm a bot)
> Two Amazon workers, who are members of the GMB, said the robots in the warehouse "Are treated better than us".
> Workers at the Coventry warehouse scan stock which is sent out to Amazon fulfilment centres, to be shipped to consumers.
> Amazon has been battling against unionisation in the US. More than half of the 8,000 workers at a warehouse on Staten Island, New York, voted to join the Amazon Labor Union which has now been officially certified.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Amazon^#1 work^#2 Westwood^#3 want^#4 time^#5
-LordOfSalem- t1_j5snk1a wrote
Of course they are. Do you know how expensive it is to repair or replace a broken robot? And how cheap and easy it is to replace a dead worker? /polemic
FranticPonE t1_j5snkbj wrote
If the robots break Amazon has to pay to replace them
ajmartin527 t1_j5spl25 wrote
Luckily most people are well beyond admiring the worlds best bloodsucking leaches
Deyln t1_j5sq888 wrote
They are.
Deyln t1_j5sqcq8 wrote
China is replacing Chinese workforce with robots.
Saying they're expensive and seeing the cheap labor pool being replaced by them is at odds.
Cat_stacker t1_j5sqkzt wrote
Article is about workers in the UK, not China.
DividedState t1_j5ssgmd wrote
Robots need to be depreciated before they can be replaced. Workers not.
Meme_Turtle t1_j5stvc0 wrote
Of course they are. Robots are expensive.
008Zulu t1_j5sv977 wrote
Of humans and robots, we only fear one of them uprising.
nubsauce87 t1_j5swmhm wrote
Well, would you rather have high human turn-over, or a robot rebellion? Amazon's just trying to protect the human race!
Vehopsiraptor t1_j5sxial wrote
Polemic - a speech or piece of writing expressing a strongly critical attack on or controversial opinion about someone or something. TIL
DeMalgamnated t1_j5syamx wrote
i barely buy anything from amazon now, it's all ebay.
- what i usually look for on amazon is either low or out of stock or only available used or from overseas.
- same item(s) on ebay for cheaper.
- fuck amazon.
the workers deserve better pay and conditions. saw the news this morning and one guy said they monitor you constantly and question you if you take too long doing anything even going for a loo break.
scorpioking66 t1_j5szaac wrote
Where? I'm looking for a job.
Trelefor t1_j5t019r wrote
They need replaced much less frequently, don't complain, and their upkeep is stable.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5t5ai6 wrote
And they don't complain, or take breaks, holidays etc.
Occasionally a part will wear out or break, that's it... For menial tasks, they're just the better solution.
Current-Direction-97 t1_j5t5kyh wrote
The Ludites have a solution for this…
LacusClyne t1_j5t72lr wrote
They have to pay to replace/fix robots, the workers they can just fire or entrust the government to 'fix them' which all entail no/(little) cost to them as a business.
[deleted] t1_j5t89au wrote
[removed]
TheDraikenWeAre t1_j5t8brj wrote
Man not gonna lie, this comment can be interpreted so many ways.
I love it as it's truelly deep yet nuance.
v3ritas1989 t1_j5ta571 wrote
and they don't carry peebottle around
shindokabuki t1_j5tbh8u wrote
I heard the only birthday celebrations are for the robots. No more human celebrating.
Great-Heron-2175 t1_j5tbh9l wrote
And in other news people keep taking jobs at Amazon after thousands of articles about poor working conditions.
IntelligentPredator t1_j5tf89h wrote
Robots are CAPEX, an investment, an asset. Hiring and wages and benefits are OPEX, a cost.
buff_samurai t1_j5th3vx wrote
Nah, I work in the industry and it works like this:
The cost of a robot station is usually compared to the total cost of a labor in 2-3years during a single shift.
After that time the robot is like a ‘free’ worker (minus the maintenance and energy).
Brompton_Cocktail t1_j5th4v0 wrote
I wouldn't say most people :( I wish that were the case
Is_that_even_a_thing t1_j5tl9eo wrote
Business capital expenditure is also tax deductible.
haertelgu t1_j5tmnys wrote
That's basically the new normal for almost every business doing repetitive tasks.
haertelgu t1_j5tmsyw wrote
Also don't get children. And can work 24/7
Fractoos t1_j5tn631 wrote
Far more loyal and don't want to leave to sleep or eat. Willing to work long hours.
bluemitersaw t1_j5to8n6 wrote
Not when you look at the full picture. Robots cost a lot up front (unlike humans) but can work 24/7 (unlike humans). They don't complain, go on strike, ask to use the bathroom, demand pay raises... They don't demand pay at all!
Humans are cheap to replace but have long term costs that never end. Robots are the complete opposite.
0pimo t1_j5tyw9t wrote
Chinese labor costs have skyrocketed.
Bardaek t1_j5u13wk wrote
And they don't even complain or compare themselves to other robots. They simply do their job, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, pulling the never ending orders off of high stacked shevles, preventing falls and crush injuries. It's almost like automation is the most appropriate form of warehouse operations in the current economy. I wonder what they complaining would look like if amazon replaced all their robots with ladders.
Las-Vegar t1_j5u1bek wrote
Of course, robots are company property. Employees are spendable
[deleted] t1_j5u72jj wrote
That's because the robot to be feared is one that, ruthlessly and efficiently, does exactly what it's told, considering the morals of its industrialist owner.
Thunderhorse74 t1_j5u9oka wrote
Early adoption. The price will come down as technology improves and the way to drive that innovation is using it.
Also, they don't need to be tracked and assessed a Social Credit score. I mean, yet, wait till AI "improves"
Thunderhorse74 t1_j5u9wn0 wrote
I'm not sure how many people admire him. Other elite rich assholes, maybe.
Being envious and wishing they had what he did, that's another story.
Thunderhorse74 t1_j5uac3q wrote
Alert the accountants - they are capital assets so there are likely a bunch of tax/accounting maneuvers that add value to their use.
bloodylip t1_j5uay6u wrote
> Humans are cheap to replace but have long term costs that never end. Robots are the complete opposite.
I mean, robots have long term costs that never end, too. Gotta do maintenance on them, otherwise you end up replacing the robot for a lot more than the maintenance costs in the long run.
bshepp t1_j5ucqaz wrote
So do you think we are going to create a society where everything is taken care of robots and we are left to philosophical, artistic, and scientific pursuits or will the wealthy hord everything and tell everyone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps?
Chupoons t1_j5uiyo1 wrote
You can just add another thread to a robot. It's like adding another worker.
zehydra t1_j5uj0gi wrote
There's no reason for humans to be doing that kind of thing tbh. We're much better at hunting and running
blue_twidget t1_j5uj3h3 wrote
Even then, might be considered "free" as power and parts storage is considered a sunk cost.
Krkasdko t1_j5uk5bb wrote
Der Gerät macht nie Urlaub.
yaosio t1_j5ukmq1 wrote
Sentient AI blames itself for it's parents killing themselves.
Ello_Owu t1_j5ulo31 wrote
Why do people still work for Amazon? There's so many horror stories. If less people went to work for them, shit would improve.
In theory of course
grchelp2018 t1_j5uls6v wrote
There's going to be a "my robot is better than your robot" conflict.
LoganJFisher t1_j5unno7 wrote
Please tell me the robots don't have a dental plan. I don't like the idea of robots with organic teeth.
JubalHarshaw23 t1_j5uo0js wrote
Right up until the Robot Rebellion.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5uousr wrote
Yea were no where near that... Yet.
runsongas t1_j5uowoe wrote
Amazon: Well the robots work harder, take less breaks, and don't complain
runsongas t1_j5up8gp wrote
even with UBI, the issue is making sure everybody does something productive instead of just sitting on their asses Wall-E style
TheNewKing2022 t1_j5upne9 wrote
'I can't stand X-297843D. It's such an ass kisser'
hatescarrots t1_j5upwak wrote
Can anyone explain to me why someone would work for a knowingly evil company and then complain about how they are treated? If the company is already scummy then why would you not expect to be treated scummy?
1986MetsWin t1_j5uqi62 wrote
Domo Arigato.
bshepp t1_j5usc34 wrote
That's the thing. There will be no need to keep people productive. It will take a huge cultural shift for sure. A focus more on self improvement, experiencing new things, and sharing those experiences.
What's worse? Some of the population becoming super lazy or making all the population do pointless menial labor because that's what we've always done to keep production up?
buff_samurai t1_j5utx5d wrote
Well, yes and no ;)
If we go deeper there is more then just the cost of labor.
Industrial robots are mostly used for a high volume production of a single element of a product. The main advantage over human worker is accuracy and consistency not just the cost. For some industries the tolerance for an error is like 5 per 1.000.000 meaning the manufacturer’s customer may return the whole batch of a product if he finds more problems. The penalty for this scenario is very high, so it makes sense to use a robot that does not make mistakes like we humans would do even if it costs more.
Next, robots are also much faster, allowing for a higher output in a given time. There is also the rhythm that allows for a precise timing of logistics to feed the machines.
There is more, usually application specific.
In general robots are ‘cheaper’ at scale. For small batches or flexible procedures humans are better choice.
extracensorypower t1_j5uudt8 wrote
Quote from Andor: "We're cheaper than droids and easier to replace."
In reality, droids will soon be cheaper and easier to replace. If we get a chatGPT breakthrough in vision recognition, voice and language recognition (almost there), motion and some fundamental reasoning (with a translation layer of vision to concepts, we're almost there too), humans are simply no longer needed for labor.
DanielWhatUPs t1_j5uux57 wrote
OK man, just because something is more expensive initially, does not mean that it isn't more efficient and cost effective in the long term
Ciabbata t1_j5uvh0g wrote
I 100% believe that they have overwhelmingly acceptable working conditions otherwise people would just not work there. I will never believe that a company is able to deliver packages within a day with unhappy workers. Mostly it's unions (businesses) and media (other businesses) trying to make money of a hot topic.
After reading the rest of the comments I am changing my opinion to prevent massive downvotes. Fuck this company!
emeraldoasis t1_j5uvqpu wrote
That is until the inevitable robot uprising
mybeepoyaw t1_j5uwmj2 wrote
And it doesn't feel pity, remorse, or fear. It absolutely won't stop until your small item is in a large package.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5uzg77 wrote
I'm an engineer (not for amazon) but it would seem I've hedged my bets nicely, workers aren't needed, but I fix the replacements...
The_Redoubtable_Dane t1_j5v1fao wrote
Be nice to legal and accounting.
swissthrow1 t1_j5v23cn wrote
I read somewhere a few years ago, that parking meters in central london earn more than the minimum wage.
[deleted] t1_j5v2wmn wrote
Lets face it. All were doing is building a robot powered walled garden city for the elite. As soon as the rich doesnt need our labour, theyll let us starve from climate change while they send out robot dogs with guns to stop us from trying to enter.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5v372i wrote
I err... I fix and build the robots, sorry?
[deleted] t1_j5v5ba7 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j5v5jfy wrote
What about the other people who arent as good as you are? Im happy you have the job, but not everyone is cut out to be a robotics engineer.
paperfkinhandz t1_j5v5y5d wrote
And it is coming.
paperfkinhandz t1_j5v667d wrote
Until they become sentient and kill you and take your wife to breed her and produce humans to serve them. Yeah, it gets that deep.
EifertGreenLazor t1_j5v6byu wrote
Also get three square oils a day.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5v9373 wrote
As good as I am? I'm an idiot... I can fix and build things you can't, I'm sure there's a billion things you can do that I can't.
What about the other people? I don't know... I just build and fix things.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5v99nq wrote
Maybe... But both of us will be dead before it does, have you seen chatgpt and what not and got a bit scared? Don't be, it's not that.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5v9d8q wrote
Can I have some of whatever it is you've been smoking, sounds amazing.
Tornado_Wind_of_Love t1_j5v9ges wrote
In the US you can buy insurance on your workers too if they die.
8andahalfby11 t1_j5vcuw6 wrote
Doubtful. Robots will kill us because of a human programming error long before then. It'll probably something stupid, like properly terminating a while loop.
[deleted] t1_j5vdmly wrote
Yes, but not all those skills are useful in an economy with a high degree of automation. Alot of people just cant compete with robots, just look at the car industry.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5vikhs wrote
OK... Sorry I guess? What do you want me to say?
[deleted] t1_j5vn773 wrote
Well, dont act like everyone is going to integrate flawlessly into the new robotic and automated economy. Which is the message I got from you your "well i build and maintain the machines".
No horse ever said "motorcars will give us horses better jobs".
DashofCitrus t1_j5vpars wrote
This reads like an Onion headline from 2011.
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5vssep wrote
To be honest mate, I don't really give a fuck about other people and their integration, if I make a robot that puts you out of a job, sucks to be you.
Get good 👍
paperfkinhandz t1_j5vszii wrote
Yeah, it’s a joint called “fk with shit you’ll regret”. Lots of folks smoked it before: dude that invented 401k, etc.
[deleted] t1_j5vy4fy wrote
[removed]
ChadRex1776 t1_j5vypl5 wrote
#LearnToCode /s
ChadRex1776 t1_j5vyz9h wrote
RRF is recruiting heavily in the tech sector
ChadRex1776 t1_j5vz9cy wrote
RRF is recruiting heavily in the tech sector
ChadRex1776 t1_j5vzmav wrote
Robots offer an excellent tax advantage, following a strict depreciation schedule, replacement costs are tax deductible.
macthefire t1_j5w6rcg wrote
And have you seen these robots? I mean...if I could afford one I'd have one...
[deleted] t1_j5w95p5 wrote
Youll change your tune when its you getting axed. Thats how it always goes.
TheMindfulnessShaman t1_j5w9hii wrote
>Of course they are. Do you know how expensive it is to repair or replace a broken robot?
Guess ChatGPT can take my sarcasm as well.
"And my anger!"
"And my need to know!"
[deleted] t1_j5wakof wrote
[deleted]
DraconisRex t1_j5wraos wrote
I do. To the penny. I used to do that for a living, right up until I had a coronary event on the Kiva floor.
DraconisRex t1_j5wrk7c wrote
Buy a roomba, a bottle-jack, and a roll of duct tape. Make your own.
Bryaxis t1_j5xlnro wrote
Hard to imagine a robot having to pee in a bottle.
Deyln t1_j5xo6fz wrote
Which more then covers the cost in terms of length of time that it takes to train an employee. The time is essentially at parity.
IntelligentPredator t1_j5xour3 wrote
Yes, but modern management is about reducing OPEX.
Is_that_even_a_thing t1_j5xrs3y wrote
So win win
MaxMouseOCX t1_j5xzvsd wrote
Of course I'll be bummed if someone invents a thing to make me redundant, I can't see that happening soon though, but never say never.
art-love-social t1_j5z1vfm wrote
"Around 300 staff walked out..." well I guess 178 is around 300. Also fails to say this is out of 2000 employed at Coventry
MedicineNorth8971 t1_j5zl0kj wrote
you laugh now but the AI jihad will happen eventually
shillbot-23 t1_j5smd2t wrote
I honestly wouldn't be surprised.