Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BeltfedOne t1_j6jw7mz wrote

Iran needs to experience a "fuck around and find out" moment. Larger than the other night. Their assistance to Russia is utterly unacceptable, among their other numerous provocations. Leaving their internal slaughter of innocents to the side for the moment.

38

DarkWangster t1_j6jwo0n wrote

Who exactly is going to hit Iran? The West isn't right about to start a war with Iran. And as an ally of Russia it makes sense that they are aiding them in this war. Ukraine doesn't have the resources to really pick a fight with Iran right now much like Russia can't pick a fight directly with the countries aiding Ukraine.

27

ntbananas t1_j6k09pk wrote

Israel most likely. Maybe Saudi Arabia with the support of some other Gulf states

21

dogeimistic t1_j6k2qte wrote

We're getting into ww3 territory here.

21

MSTRMN_ t1_j6morgd wrote

Lol, how is going to be a "world war" when the only adversary will be Iran?

0

Beautiful_Ad_3402 t1_j6kewp5 wrote

I mentioned WW3 and got about 30 downvotes on this forum lol, hope is a hell of a drug. Be prepared, good luck and my best wishes to everyone

−11

LayneLowe t1_j6llg5s wrote

Well a regional war, non NATO. Probably just drones, covert and cyber.

0

Just_a_follower t1_j6k2976 wrote

This guy knows what’s up. Israel and Saudi can also both deflect at each other . I Dunno who it could have been Supreme Leader. Who has reason to not like you ? 🤷‍♂️

5

Odd-Koala1290 t1_j6kt5mr wrote

Most countries are involved in arms sales for profit. Iran is still a sovereign nation.

Accusing one country of international war crimes when you and your allies are doing the same thing is tired. Let's just hope Iran and Russia don't start any "shock and awe" offensives any time soon.

9

BeltfedOne t1_j6ktmmk wrote

You are aware that would be suicide for both nations?

2

Odd-Koala1290 t1_j6kucd6 wrote

Ya, if Russia launched as many missiles at civilian targets (with help from Iran), as the US did at the start of the Gulf war II (operation shock and awe) the western media would call for intervention. Too bad Iraq didn't have western media on their side.

−3

adventure_in_gnarnia t1_j6lyv41 wrote

Fundamentally, how is Iran selling Russia weapons any different than NATO arming Ukraine?

Not defending Russia/Iran, but if you want to escalate providing weapons to direct involvement the implications are clear what that means.

−5

EternalPinkMist t1_j6m1c8a wrote

Assisting someone in self defense is generally not frowned upon while assisting in unprovoked murder is.

8

gbgonzalez923 t1_j6m5zwm wrote

How is the guy who helped the murderer shoot kids at school any different from the guy who helped kill the murderer? They're both doing the same thing

1

ChadorLondo t1_j6k5gje wrote

Exactly. Israel already has stealth F-35s and a competent air force that already successfully destroyed nuclear reactors before. Why aren't they dealing with Iran decisively considering they are an inch away from a nuclear bomb?

−8

valvaro t1_j6kmxly wrote

That is what you call invading... the last thing anyone need at the moment

5

Sweet-Sale-7303 t1_j6kfygp wrote

Didn't they use drones to do exactly that recently?

1

ChadorLondo t1_j6kizmt wrote

No they only hit some drone producing factory. The nuclear plant itself is buried under a mountain and I'm afraid drones can't do much to it.

2

neverfarts t1_j6m5579 wrote

Because the iranian nuclear program is light years ahead of the Iraqi one. Some of it is buried so deep, only the US's biggest of bombs, deliverable only by US strategic bombers stand a chance of destroying it. Israel can't execute this all alone, as they did in Iraq and Syria. So until American support and active engagement is guaranteed, nothing on such scale will happen.

1

AltNationReality t1_j6jwr1p wrote

As much as I would like to agree with you..... the US and EU are doing the same thing. (And I get it... russia is the aggressor..... but.....)

−18

Feynnehrun t1_j6jy733 wrote

Coming to the defense of a sovereign nation against an illegal aggressor is not "the same thing" as supplying arms to an illegal aggressor and assisting them in their murder of civilian populations.

18

AltNationReality t1_j6k9nrc wrote

Yes, I get it.. I said so. But attacking another country because they're supplying arms is a bit too far. You're suggesting opening up a new front in this world war. Don't stop at iran... NK and China are also supplying arms and logistics. Are you suggesting that they "get some" also?

−5

Feynnehrun t1_j6kbjkj wrote

>You're suggesting opening up a new front in this world war.

I was suggesting no such thing.

3