protocols, but the NC sidestepped those nicely, as usual.
[https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article\_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html)
[https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/](https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/)
[https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article\_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html)
Lelabear t1_irit3bg wrote
Reply to comment by Dragonmodus in Great Sand Dunes National Park expands by 9,300 acres by tta2013
protocols, but the NC sidestepped those nicely, as usual. [https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article\_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/noonan-a-crazy-quilt-of-conservation-easements-confounds-coloradans/article_d05e69ba-3000-11e9-a2a9-6b531fdb2855.html) [https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/](https://kdvr.com/news/local/great-sand-dunes-national-park-grows-by-9300-acres/) [https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article\_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html](https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/in-response-column-miscast-conservation-effort-for-historic-colorado-ranch/article_47a32c20-3486-11e9-853d-47c596e32183.html)