author has commented recently that he still holds the same opinion.
More recent (Jan 2022): https://www.scienceabc.com/humans/the-human-brain-vs-supercomputers-which-one-wins.html#evolution-of-computers
Generally though I don’t think there is a consensus on this because there
more abundant. The main reason we use gold is because it doesn't corrode or oxidize.
https://www.scienceabc.com/pure-sciences/copper-conducts-electricity-better-use-gold-electronics.html
needs an oxidizer (Oxygen is not the only oxidizer). Fire would look different in space though.
https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/universe/can-spaceships-actually-explode-like-they-do-in-movies.html#:\~:text=In%20space%2C%20there%20is%20no,once%20they%20%E2%80%9Cblow%20up
there is no sound, only puffs of air.
The observer effect is a well documented phenomenon https://www.scienceabc.com/pure-sciences/observer-effect-quantum-mechanics.html
Whether I understand the nuances of the experiment is irrelevant to understanding the concept
billjames1685 OP t1_ivg2iio wrote
Reply to comment by LordOfGalaxy in [D] At what tasks are models better than humans given the same amount of data? by billjames1685
author has commented recently that he still holds the same opinion. More recent (Jan 2022): https://www.scienceabc.com/humans/the-human-brain-vs-supercomputers-which-one-wins.html#evolution-of-computers Generally though I don’t think there is a consensus on this because there