290077
290077 t1_j6tbdb3 wrote
Reply to comment by HoneydewInMyAss in How to be a sceptic | We have an ethical responsibility to adopt a sceptical attitude to everything from philosophy and science to economics and history in the pursuit of a good life for ourselves and others. by IAI_Admin
>The lies about "vaccines causing autism" is NOT SCIENCE!
>It was debunked by science!
>It was debunked BY the peer review process!
The paper claiming that took 12 years to be retracted from the journal it was published in. The peer review process sure took its sweet time.
290077 t1_j02w7el wrote
Reply to comment by healthierlurker in Frequently using digital devices to soothe young children may backfire. The habit of using devices to manage difficult behavior strengthens over time as media demands strengthen as well. The more often devices are used, the less practice children - get to use other coping strategies by Wagamaga
40 is millennial now
290077 t1_iwzj8kz wrote
Reply to Solar calculator bought circa 1985. Needs brighter light now, otherwise works perfectly, even in hexadecimal. by lake_huron
Where's the i button?
290077 t1_j6tc1d6 wrote
Reply to comment by TheNinjaPro in How to be a sceptic | We have an ethical responsibility to adopt a sceptical attitude to everything from philosophy and science to economics and history in the pursuit of a good life for ourselves and others. by IAI_Admin
https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/
You're telling me none of these passed peer review? Look at the timelines, several of these took over a decade between publication and retraction.