2D_VR
2D_VR t1_j2e633x wrote
Reply to comment by diskifi in "Meet the Neuralink Cofounder Who Left and Started a Competitor That's Now Rapidly Catching Up" by ThePlanckDiver
Not saying that's good. But the beef industry does exist
2D_VR t1_j0y4kdu wrote
Reply to comment by kidigus in PsBattle: this rat with a knife by invisibledirigible
So good it took me a minute to find it
2D_VR t1_izweslc wrote
Reply to comment by apple_achia in Just today someone posted a Twitter thread about Nuclear Fusion... by natepriv22
I think in some cases thermal couples can also be used. But yeah steam is pretty robust honestly
2D_VR t1_iu7u6j1 wrote
Reply to If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
We know how what we build works to an extent. For instance a chatbot only responds once queried and only replies with "the first thing it thinks of" .we need to allow for repeated thought an non selection. As well as a recursive structure. The depth of neurons problem has nearly been solved. See stable diffusion. So it should soon be an integration problem. Basically I think we'll know when we've made one. We'll be able to ask it to explain something to us and have it display the images on a screen that it's thinking of while it talks. The fact that we will be able to see it's thoughts, means we don't have to rely on a conversation prompt alone to tell if it's human level intelligent. It shouldn't be a big surprise to the people building it.
2D_VR t1_itseri8 wrote
Reply to comment by Ijustdowhateva in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
Something to consider about "free will" is that we can imagine multiple futures and select which we think is best. Whereas a chatbot receives a query and responds with the first think it thinks of and then stops thinking. It's like we run the same query continuously until some time limit has been reached. Making slight changes to internally determined weights. And then with some rating system select the highest scored future plan. This is a selection algorithm that still works with determinism
2D_VR t1_isanph7 wrote
Reply to DeepMind breaks 50-year math record using AI; new record falls a week later by Melodic-Work7436
That is a weird algorithm. I don't think I would have come up with it given a million years
2D_VR t1_j5hjuqv wrote
Reply to [Image] Everyday, when closing my office door, I get a motivation boost. by Thompsonss
That thing can fuck right off