AbyssalRedemption

AbyssalRedemption t1_jabeg6q wrote

I mean, this is definitely kind of the problem of our times. Billionaires and corporations have taken into charging forward into the “technological determinism” paradigm, where technological “progress” takes precedence and society should adapt to it, as opposed to innovating tech and progress BASED on society’s evolving demands, ala a sort of “technological voluntarism”. They’ve pushed this so much over the past few decades that I think most of society just accepts that it’s the status quo. Meanwhile, it’s this rampant, uncontrolled, unmonitored growth that’s leading to the planet’s rampant exploitation/ destruction, and humanity failing to keep up with the rate of technology. It’s not a sustainable model anymore.

2

AbyssalRedemption t1_j65uzka wrote

Well see, this is the thing: if it become even somewhat clear to the public at large that these things were going to inevitably happen, people wouldn’t just sit and take it. You lay off 20% of the work force, and people will riot. Disrupt the current order too quickly and there will be civil unrest, potentially hindering future progress.

1

AbyssalRedemption t1_j5utlsc wrote

Art is a unique topic when it comes to AI, for if you ask the AI what inspired it to create a specific pieces, it will not answer, for it cannot feel. There are myriad reasons and sources from which a person draws upon to create a work of art. While an AI can replicate their style, and create something unique in the vein of their original work, it can never replicate the passion and emotion that leads to a work’s creation. This, in my opinion, will always give human artwork more meaning.

1