Ahaigh9877
Ahaigh9877 t1_je0lqna wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
Linear growth is going up by the same amount per unit time; exponential is going up by a proportion of the previous total per unit time. Right?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j9s4iwc wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in US Copyright Office: You Can't Copyright Images Generated Using AI by vadhavaniyafaijan
As in, attaching value to something that's scarce? How do you stop people doing that?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j832tpx wrote
Reply to comment by Substantial_Space478 in How far are we from this technology? by FusionRocketsPlease
If only there were AI agents with that skill.
Ahaigh9877 t1_j54qv1a wrote
Reply to What a cheeky bastard… by MainBan4h8gNzis
Oh, we're supposed to pronounce it "gapt", are we?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j50x40z wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
> They also like to be high and have sex, al lot, when they have nothing better to do.
Better?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j3qe46w wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Do you think in the 2030s it will be common for most households to have a 3D printer? by BeginningInfluence55
That video is 16 years old; are we any further along?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j1ynra4 wrote
Won't AI art become (as it already is to quite a degree) the opposite of "off the rack". It can become as bespoke as you want, and increasingly so as the technology matures. And it'll surely be far more versatile (not to mention fast and cheap) as any individual artist could be.
But traditional, hand-produced art will presumably continue to hold its value, and there might remain a collector's market for new pieces.
And, something that's often overlooked for some reason, hand-made pieces from non-famous, local type artists will surely continue to sell for quite some time, because they're hand-made.
Ahaigh9877 t1_j1yn6vm wrote
Reply to comment by lacergunn in AI art is the ‘machine made fabric’ of tomorrow. by thetwitchy1
Can't it be both of those things, seen from different perspectives?
Ahaigh9877 t1_j1q0e4v wrote
Reply to comment by devinhedge in One thing ChatGPT desperately needs: An upgrade to its humor by diener1
I read that as Jimmy from South Park.
Ahaigh9877 t1_ixge93g wrote
Reply to comment by literalproblemsolver in Neuralink Co-Founder Unveils Rival Company That Won't Force Patients To Drill Holes in Their Skull by Economy_Variation365
Nope, it’s evil Monopoly Man sitting on his massive pile of money. It’s simple. Goodies and baddies.
Ahaigh9877 t1_ixge0k7 wrote
Reply to comment by RikerT_USS_Lolipop in Neuralink Co-Founder Unveils Rival Company That Won't Force Patients To Drill Holes in Their Skull by Economy_Variation365
> But it’s not the competition doing that. It’s the individuals in charge of those companies deciding to do those things.
What would it look like if it were competition doing that? How would it be different? And how do you know it’s not competition doing it?
In any case, it’s a false dichotomy man. The idea is that competition drives individuals to do those things. People need incentives and that’s one of them.
You can criticise “capitalism” for all sorts of things, and rightly so in many cases I’m sure. But the basic idea that competition can drive innovation surely isn’t total nonsense, is it?
Ahaigh9877 t1_jees4la wrote
Reply to comment by Bismar7 in Interesting article: AI will eventually free people up to 'work when they want to,' ChatGPT investor predicts by Coolsummerbreeze1
This is a thoughtful and relevant post that someone took the time to write. If you disagree with it, say why.
Don't downvote things just because you disagree with them.