Ashwagandalf
Ashwagandalf t1_ja6dpk3 wrote
Reply to Has The Quality of Books Declined? by chrislamtheories
Yes. The proliferation of mass technology, especially digital media, is poisoning something at the heart of what allows people to make good art—something that has to with the way we relate to our narratives, personal and collective, own and other.
It's not just books; every creative field is suffering in this way except arguably television, which is holding on longer than the rest, to a large extent by cannibalizing resources from them (books, music, etc.) as they deteriorate.
Ashwagandalf t1_j9ves09 wrote
Reply to comment by LaHawks in TIFU by recommending a friend seek therapy by Rekno2005
You're being downvoted because Reddit, but yes, there's something incredibly lazy and cruel (not to mention antithetical to therapy, which it waters down to the point of meaninglessness) about the blunt-force way therapy-speak is wielded in the TikTok era.
Ashwagandalf t1_j9v8fyk wrote
Reply to TIFU by recommending a friend seek therapy by Rekno2005
One strongly suspects pertinent details have been left out of this account.
Ashwagandalf t1_j9iset7 wrote
Reply to What does this mean? I understand it but don't understand it. The examples are a bit confusing. I am not sure how the pattern works. Maybe some more examples would help? by [deleted]
For one thing, those aren't opposites. And that italicized "purpose" elicits what we used to call "douche chills" back in the day. Whatever you're reading, it sure doesn't look like a great use of time.
Ashwagandalf t1_j8xjh2q wrote
Reply to TIFU By sleeping less than 3 hours everyday for a month and causing it to all catch up to me at once by pebblesky
Lack of sleep + high-grade marijuana is an excellent recipe for making bad things worse. All things considered, sounds like abstaining for a good while might be in your best interest.
Ashwagandalf t1_j29yuio wrote
Reply to comment by hippobiscuit in Opposing viewpoint book pairings? by MarioP79
I mean, that's like prime Ali vs. teenage, pre-Cus D'Amato Tyson. Make it Das Kapital, now...
Ashwagandalf t1_jeabpn4 wrote
Reply to Finally reading Tolkien by jdbrew
Tolkien's not a specialist in scintillating dialogue, but he's not bad at it either, in the archaic style he favors, and the "meaningless details" you so dislike are much of the substance of his work—one suspects, based on your description, that the problem here is more your attention span coupled with a general lack of exposure to classic English literature. Anyway if you want snappy dialogue read some Wodehouse.