BKCowGod

BKCowGod t1_j6fz73r wrote

In California it was 165. I know, I had the same engine in my '77 GMC (which didn't have catalytic converters).

I understand you are very passionate about this. If you really believe American V8s of the late 70s and early 80s were actually great then that's on you.

0

BKCowGod t1_j6firb4 wrote

You're right, but still more HP than the domestic 350. 167 in the US. My 535 in the US was making 218 and an M5 was making 286. Alfa Romeo was getting a little over 1 horsepower per cubic inch out of their 4cyl that had been in use since the 50s.

1

BKCowGod t1_j6erxm1 wrote

I had a customer who installed a device to make his V6 Camaro misfire on purpose to mimic a lumpy cam.

Meanwhile my fiancee was shredding the tires on a subcompact Spark EV drag racing my Z06. Technology is so fun, though I will admit the modern stuff is a bit too seamless and perfect for my taste - my daily driver is 60 years old in two years.

2

BKCowGod t1_j6ef6w9 wrote

Fun fact, depending on the year and state that Camaro may have made a rip snorting 165 horsepower out of a 5.7. Meanwhile BMW was getting 190 horsepower out of a 2.8l.

We were dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age. Still looked cool though!

21

BKCowGod t1_iw1vb9k wrote

It was apparently a bit of a pig to fly. Interestingly even though it was a trainer it was kept fully combat capable (other than the loss of their Hughes fire control system) and at least a couple were used in combat roles in Vietnam.

2