BadgerSilver
BadgerSilver t1_iv7k5hg wrote
Reply to comment by atomfullerene in How many children did Homo Erectus tend to have? by [deleted]
I don't believe it, we're no different from hunter gatherers in capability of having yearly offspring. In religious communities where I grew up, most families had kids spaced ~2 years apart, and they had access to birth control. Nursing hormones don't outright block pregnancy for 4 years. I bet we can find a study
edit: from the NHS "Most couples will get pregnant within a year if they have regular sex and don't use contraception". We can safely assume this applies to hunter gatherers. This 4 year thing is absurd.
BadgerSilver t1_iv0020i wrote
Reply to comment by DumbDekuKid in How many children did Homo Erectus tend to have? by [deleted]
This has to be due to infant mortality. I can't imagine they weren't just having sex and getting pregnant whenever they could
BadgerSilver t1_iqvd8yq wrote
Reply to comment by PTR_K in 'Extinct' wood-eating cockroach rediscovered after 80 years by Nikami
This is called "convergent evolution" where two unrelated species develop to look the same due to similar needs
BadgerSilver t1_iv7m3wu wrote
Reply to comment by muskytortoise in How many children did Homo Erectus tend to have? by [deleted]
Humans will have babies every 1-2 years consistently if fertile with unprotected intercourse. Are you saying homo erectus is that different?