Badloss
Badloss t1_ja8k982 wrote
Reply to comment by adam_demamps_wingman in Anti-war partisans in Belarus claim to have damaged Russian plane | Belarus by Caratteraccio
The US Navy has lasers on their ships that could pretty effortlessly shoot down slow fragile drones
Badloss t1_iydd0yr wrote
Reply to comment by man2010 in Boston Daily Discussion Thread, Wednesday November 30 by AutoModerator
"I live 40 minutes away from work and only budget 20 minutes to get there, wtf this city is a mess and I demand they fix my commute"
Badloss t1_ixuvl70 wrote
I don't understand the point of Fentanyl. Maybe it's my innocent lamb DARE propaganda conditioning but is there any upside to using it? It seems like the only point of Fentanyl is to trick people into thinking it's heroin or something and then it kills them. Is it even possible to use Fentanyl safely?
Badloss t1_ixhda30 wrote
Reply to comment by CptTurnersOpticNerve in What's the general consensus on the second season of Inside Job on Netflix? by PetyrDayne
A few of the episodes seemed like direct R&M episode remakes, like the love potion one. I still like this though because it's more aggressively political vs the Rick and Morty "everything is stupid" nihilism
Badloss t1_ixhd4xm wrote
Reply to comment by krissyjump in What's the general consensus on the second season of Inside Job on Netflix? by PetyrDayne
I thought the way they resolved the finale was predictable but it still hit like a ton of bricks anyway. I think it's good writing when you figure out a twist and it still affects you regardless
Badloss t1_iuk69f0 wrote
Reply to comment by DanFuckingSchneider in What responses to your dating posts/profile have turned you off? [Serious] by [deleted]
Those are almost always bots trying to get you to an unmoderated platform so they can sell you things
Badloss t1_iuk669e wrote
Reply to comment by marvelanne5289 in What responses to your dating posts/profile have turned you off? [Serious] by [deleted]
I think you're supposed to say something like I'm not wearing any pajamas so they can respond with something like "neither will I!!!"
Badloss t1_iuir2ed wrote
Reply to comment by SplinterPizza in The Thing (1982) -- the scene with MaReady checking on Blair in the cabin by darthvirgin
Yeah I mean of course we're all speculating. I just disagree that the mimics don't know they're mimics. I think they know exactly what they are and just know exactly how to fake being human.
There's actually a great example of what you're talking about in the Dune books though. The Tleilaxu invent perfect Face Dancers that completely replicate their target and then the mimicry is so perfect that the copy believes it's the original and they lose control of them
Badloss t1_iuimitz wrote
Reply to comment by SplinterPizza in The Thing (1982) -- the scene with MaReady checking on Blair in the cabin by darthvirgin
It doesn't, because that's not what the thing is doing.
The thing has access to the host's memories and instincts and uses them to perfectly imitate the host. I disagree that it's building a functional simulation of the host's consciousness to do that
Badloss t1_iui8xb9 wrote
Reply to comment by Froegerer in The Thing (1982) -- the scene with MaReady checking on Blair in the cabin by darthvirgin
I don't think that's what's going on. I think The Thing is perfectly emulating the person, if you were assimilated then you are dead and your consciousness is gone.
I think the characters are just wrong when they say that, or they're imperfectly trying to describe how good the mimcry is
Badloss t1_ja8shyz wrote
Reply to comment by The69BodyProblem in Anti-war partisans in Belarus claim to have damaged Russian plane | Belarus by Caratteraccio
That's true of any defense, but if the number is high enough then the attack is prohibitive. That's generally also why the high value targets like Carriers are sitting in the center of a web of ships that are all networked together.