BinyaminDelta
BinyaminDelta t1_ivutr5h wrote
Reply to comment by stupidimagehack in Will Text to Game be possible? by Independent-Book4660
Yeah Codex isn't what he's describing. In OPs scenario the code would be hidden, you'd be building games visually and with your voice on the fly.
"Create a first person shooter. Genre is zombie, post apocalyptic. Okay, change the first level to an urban setting, at dusk....."
Etc etc. Imagine you have a super-fast game developer sitting at a desk and you're looking over their shoulder, giving instructions and feedback....
But it's faster than any human and you're INSIDE the game in VR, building it as you see it.
BinyaminDelta t1_ivucmr7 wrote
Reply to Will Text to Game be possible? by Independent-Book4660
Yes.
Text to Video is already happening, and Text to 3D Environment doesn't seem particularly more difficult.
In many ways it may be easier, since 3D elements can be broken down into components and "understood" by an AI.
For example, a 3D room has a floor, walls which connect, a ceiling. Now generate varieties.
Or a 3D character: A body has known elements. A face has specific parts. Look at Unreals Meta Humans, which are ultra-realistic faces with feature sliders.
Much of this already exists within the game building and level building world. It's just been under-trained by modern AI practices.
NVIDIA is working on it, as are many others. I wouldn't be surprised if we see mind-blowing examples of this working in months not years.
BinyaminDelta t1_ityfxr9 wrote
There's a fun "singularity theory" that Bitcoin is AGI in stealth mode.
It has tricked humans into feeding it huge amounts of GPU compute and electricity.
Satoshi is unknown because "he" was and is an AI. Basic human greed for wealth was used as leverage.
I'm not saying I endorse this but it made me go, "waiiiiit a minute...."
BinyaminDelta t1_ityfizy wrote
Reply to First time for everything. by cloudrunner69
Or we're in an ancestor simulation and we're experiencing this incredible time in history because it's been selected as interesting.
BinyaminDelta t1_ityfeqv wrote
Reply to comment by Smoke-away in First time for everything. by cloudrunner69
Mom's Spaghetti
BinyaminDelta t1_itvf0zj wrote
Reply to Lots of posts here talk about how AI advancements and automation are going to inevitably replace jobs. As someone without interest or acumen in programming or IT, what sort of "future-proof" field(s) should I be looking into as a way to maintain (for lack of a better term) viability? by doctordaedalus
A few days ago I posted a similar question about how people can prepare, and it received many insightful answers.
And then the /singularity mods removed it as "Off Topic." Go figure.
BinyaminDelta OP t1_ittp4g9 wrote
Reply to comment by mrnonel in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
Can you provide example use cases?
BinyaminDelta OP t1_ittp0h3 wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Hu-Man in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
A stock market spider, similar to the classic SPY symbol.
BinyaminDelta OP t1_ittoniv wrote
Reply to comment by Skank_Hunt49 in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
They required a four-year BS degree to "do mundane tasks such as document writing?"
A former Bachelor's position replaced by GPT-3, really?
Sorry but I'm about skeptical about this.
BinyaminDelta OP t1_ittod82 wrote
Reply to comment by sonderlingg in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
The real Singularity was the friends we made along the way
BinyaminDelta t1_ittlugj wrote
Reply to comment by misterhamtastic in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
This. They're saying "thinks aren't perfectly instant!"
Right... But wasn't that fairly obvious already?
BinyaminDelta t1_ittloxr wrote
Reply to comment by Ijustdowhateva in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
You're the one desperately trying to convince people that they have no influence over their own existence.
BinyaminDelta t1_ittlayk wrote
Reply to comment by Article_Used in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
It was an interview from before Annaka, and maybe a few months back if I recall.
BinyaminDelta t1_ittkz9x wrote
This is an interesting article, but I don't see it as particularly insightful.
After all, of course our experience is technically a memory -- if there is even the tiniest fraction of delay in an occurrence and our processing of it, it's a memory.
This seems to be describing the obvious with fancier terms.
Say you touch a hot stove. There is a short but real time delay before your nerves register the heat, send the signal to your brain, are processed as pain, and a course of action (remove hand!) decided.
By the time all this happens, some T quantity of Time has passed. Well, yes -- we're always a bit behind the ball, and by definition everything is a memory.
But is this a new concept or particularly useful? I'm not seeing it.
BinyaminDelta t1_ittkdkf wrote
Reply to comment by SejaGentil in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
Saying "we take no part in our actions" is interesting, but be cautious.
This view can lead to a dangerous path, which is the "humans have no free will" claim.
I say dangerous, because history has shown disturbing outcomes to this way of thinking. Crimes against others become easier to justify if "free will is an illusion" and we're just walking physical impulses.
Why is slavery wrong if humans don't have free will at all? Why is fascism evil if groups of humans are just chemical reactions?
Humanism -- and I would suppose most here are humanists -- should lean toward the presumption of free will and work to defend it, not minimize it.
BinyaminDelta t1_itov8lg wrote
Reply to comment by FranciscoJ1618 in When do you predict America will implement UBI? by fignewtgingrich
Bad side: UBI at 90%+ of the population will maybe end up being dictatorial.
Kind of explains the American distaste for communism.
BinyaminDelta OP t1_itouly8 wrote
Reply to comment by TheHamsterSandwich in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
I think you're right. There's going to be a strange, probably turbulent time between Now and Then.
BinyaminDelta OP t1_itoqh1r wrote
Reply to comment by rushmc1 in How should an individual best prepare for the next five - ten years? by BinyaminDelta
I presume the Singularity "position" is a T-pose.
Submitted by BinyaminDelta t3_ycvha2 in singularity
BinyaminDelta t1_itoh4ta wrote
Reply to comment by GeneralZain in Large Language Models Can Self-Improve by xutw21
Allegedly many people do not have an inner monologue.
I say allegedly because I can't fathom this, but it's apparently true.
BinyaminDelta t1_itogt4e wrote
Reply to comment by 4e_65_6f in Large Language Models Can Self-Improve by xutw21
John Carmack on Lex Friedman predicated that the code for AGI would be surprisingly straightforward.
BinyaminDelta t1_itogfd3 wrote
Reply to comment by imlaggingsobad in Is anything better than FTL as a future? by ribblle
Yeah, people who mock the metaverse (as a concept, not the Zuck version) are fooling themselves about how addicting it will be.
I remember the first time I used an Oculus and it was so immersive, I forgot my friends were in the room.
True full-dive would be technological lucid dreaming, and probably the most addicting experience any human has experienced.
Anyone who tries it will want it.
BinyaminDelta t1_itofsy1 wrote
Reply to comment by multi_tasty in Is anything better than FTL as a future? by ribblle
Hot Singles In Your Area Now
Damn popup ads.
BinyaminDelta t1_itofpx1 wrote
Reply to comment by grossexistence in Is anything better than FTL as a future? by ribblle
Wouldn't you want to at least have probes, out exploring and gathering data?
How would you simulate "the real world" without information on it?
BinyaminDelta t1_ivvhgvd wrote
Reply to comment by was_der_Fall_ist in Will Text to Game be possible? by Independent-Book4660
Yeah Web Voice API is literally built into Chrome. Voice to speech is trivial at this point, and only getting better with systems like Whisper.