Brief_Profession_148

Brief_Profession_148 t1_jaauqp7 wrote

Reply to This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin

There needs to be an amendment creating a 4th branch of government that only prosecutes corruption. It must publish all of it’s investigations publicly after completion, conviction or not.

2

Brief_Profession_148 t1_j9klri2 wrote

Reply to comment by idungiveboutnothing in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123

Not even comparable. The problem isn’t that Isis video are being looked up or are being missed from being removed in a timely fashion. It’s that their reckless poorly written algorithms are suggesting Isis videos after people look at unrelated topics. It’s not the content gatekeeping as the sole issue here, it’s that algorithms are promoting terrible content that is dangerous because it decided it would keep engagement to sell ads. They control that algorithm, they have responsibility for the content they promote just like a normal publisher can be liable for their content. They crossed the line from host to publisher when they started using algorithms to curate content.

9

Brief_Profession_148 t1_j9kc6xo wrote

Reply to Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123

They curate with their algorithms. They want protections as passive hosts of information, they should have to turn off their algorithms. If they want to curate what you watch to maximize their profit, they should be responsible for what that algorithm directs people to. They don’t get to be passive hosts and active curators like a publisher at the same time.

146