Thank you. If you are still interested the edit on my post may help clarify what I’m looking for.

I’m asking with regards to the application/assessment of carbon credits, which regulators will decide based on (a degree of) consensus about which multiplier is appropriate. The two numbers used most commonly are 25 and 84, and I am trying to gain an understanding of which is most likely to stand up to scrutiny/be most accepted in calculation.

Turing test failed. Well done!