I don't know how to even approach consideration of this curiosity. It is intriguing in its layout, and yet indescribably baffling. Did the author intend any structure? Is there meaning in the clusters and islands? The work intrigues, but leaves the viewer hopelessly lost in the depths of its mystery.

I'm just enjoying commenting at this point. I am actually interested in the full essay that would enlighten us about exactly how this chart can be interpreted.

Edit: Also, I disagree with the insinuation that a viewer has any obligation to help with the presentation of the data. We have awarded feedback, and with that, you may make a choice: Will you try again and improve the work, portraying the glory of excitement that you've felt upon pondering the mystery you've sought to dispel? Or will you leave the viewership to ponder the mystery of the graphic they see before them, and the origin of the authorship which led to its creation? It is up to you, and you have no real obligation to choose the former option. The only difference you will see is in your Reddit point count, which you may or may not see as consequential, but which absolutely is inconsequential in the grand scheme of life.

Even with that, it would seem to have the level and quality of meaning I could attribute to any given audio track on Autechre's album, "Draft 7.30".

This is incomprehensible in its current form. It doesn't seem to link anything to anything else in any way that makes sense. I am utterly baffled trying to decipher it.

Thank you for this amazing comment. Do you happen to also have ideas about the recycling implications of these plastics worldwide? I'm curious if they can all be recycled in Norway but some can't be in North America because of lacking technology.