Clarkeprops
Clarkeprops t1_j07ch1f wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
I disagree. Lots of people don’t want to do anything but self indulgent pursuits. Video games, partying, drinking, eating… nobody wants to be a server and everyone wants to be served.
Clarkeprops t1_j07bsvy wrote
Reply to comment by 0913856742 in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
You’re hearing wrong.
They DID NOT suffer. They lived through the most prosperous time known to humanity and were given more opportunity for wealth than my generation or any other. I can’t speak to any one’s personal experience, but for the boomer generation, that settled.
ALSO, they are responsible for the economic and environmental situation we’re in, so forgive me if I don’t have sympathy for their misfortune that they’re only just now joining me in.
The struggle isn’t new to me so if being better at it gives me an edge for once, I’m going to take it and feel ZERO remorse. It’s the first and maybe the last time I’ll get any kind of edge.
Oh, I’m sorry, “Interest”? Since when does interest play a part in survival? I’m currently unemployed and am looking for plenty of jobs I’m not interested in. I wasn’t aware that beggars can be choosers.
Clarkeprops t1_j07abt5 wrote
Reply to comment by rdlenke in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
Part of what can guarantee it is organized labour. The reason the TTC didn’t just fire everyone is the union.
For the record, everyone bitched and moaned about grocery store clerks losing their jobs to machines, and that didn’t really happen. I was at a store the other day that removed the machines. Every grocery store I’ve been to has lots of lanes, with lots of clerks, in addition to the machines.
It would be great if the conversion could be gradual, but anyone that thinks that robots doing auto sector tasks instead of a person is bad…. I just don’t agree with them. Let the robots do it and we’ll do something else. Then everything will cost less for everyone.
Clarkeprops t1_j0794lc wrote
Reply to comment by 0913856742 in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
No, they can’t just hang out. Have you even seen the show? The ship takes constant maintenance by people with a LOT of training.
That’s my point. NOBODY can just hang out. Unless you want to live like a caveman, all of these things around us are the product of someone’s hard work. Even with the craziest AI, it doesn’t just happen. The phone doesn’t just get delivered to your hand. Peoples work is required. People have to put in effort. Why are you an exception?
Clarkeprops t1_j076la8 wrote
Reply to comment by rdlenke in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
You’re partly right, and I have ZERO sympathy for people who are entirely inflexible. And those elderly lived in a time where you didn’t need to finish high school and could afford a house in 5 years. Forgive me if I don’t cry them a river. I’ve had to hustle my whole life and provide value where I’m able and I still struggle.
I think that there should be a limit to how much machines are able to take over, pairing it with attrition. Similar to the automation of Transit systems like the TTC. Trains and stations are already automated. Drivers and attendants aren’t being fired or laid off. They’re just not hiring any extras. Nobody has to lose their job.
That being said, creative destruction isn’t new. 2000 dung shovelers in New York City lost their jobs when they switched to cars from horses. And many other jobs were created in fuel transport, mechanics, and other industries to support the car. Imagine trying to ban cars because someone will lose their job shovelling shit?
Clarkeprops t1_j075npf wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
Oh I’m sorry, does having a house require someone else to build it for you? You mean you don’t know how to do that? I guess you’ll need someone else to put in that hard labour. If only there was a way to provide value and easily exchange that value for other goods and services…
In all seriousness, you currently live somewhere that you didn’t build, and don’t maintain. You don’t generate your own power, or refine your own fuel.
What are you suggesting the new paradigm is? I’m certain you haven’t thought it out at all.
Let’s hear it.
Clarkeprops t1_j0744yv wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
Yes. Late stage capitalism is toxic. I’m not saying you should make ANYONE any money. Even just picking up trash 30 hours a week. Do SOMETHING. Fix city benches. Repair books at the library. Repaint playgrounds. Be a kids soccer coach. ANYTHING. Just do a thing for society.
Clarkeprops t1_j072l30 wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
Nope. You definitely don’t know where I’m going with this. No slaving. No rigid structure. No social ladder. Just don’t be a lazy parasite and expect everyone else to work for you. That’s what billionaires do now, and they’re fucking cunts.
If you want input, you should output. You want the benefit of others work? Then find a way to contribute. Don’t want to participate? That’s fine too. Have a house in the middle of nowhere and be self sufficient. No slaving, rigidity, or any of it. Entirely up to you.
Clarkeprops t1_j06y8ca wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
No it isn’t. Making yourself coffee isn’t work. Providing a service of value to society is work. If you enjoy it and don’t consider it work, I don’t care. Make art. Care for the sick. Work with kids. Doesn’t matter. If you expect someone to grow your food, repair your utilities, generate your power, and ship your goods, don’t think that nothing is required in return.
Imagine Star Trek. Everyone has a job. Nobody just hangs out in the holodek all day every day.
Clarkeprops t1_j06nn6j wrote
Reply to comment by ProfessorUpham in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
It’s not. And there will ALWAYS be work for humans to do. What that is will shift, but jobs will always be a thing. Even in a world like iRobot where all menial tasks are covered, there will be PLENTY for humans to do. Being lazy is and always has been lamentable. There is a way for you to contribute to the society you choose to live in, and opting out makes you a shitty person. Volunteer, make art, care for the elderly, make things for people. Design better ways to do things. Be an activist for change.
All those things are jobs, and not helping out makes you shitty and devoid of value.
Clarkeprops t1_j06n160 wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
You’re welcome to exit the system. There are communes everywhere. Funny enough, they have a system that they all agree on that states how much work/contribution is required. Feeding chickens, cleaning up, burying waste… You can’t live anywhere and just be lazy/useless.
If you don’t want to work, who do you expect is going to come feed you?
Clarkeprops t1_j06iv1i wrote
Everyone wants food, shelter, healthcare, education… those things aren’t free. They require other humans to dedicate substantial time into doing
You need to contribute to society, and sometimes the contribution required is going to be something you don’t want to do. This is called a ”job”
Clarkeprops t1_iz8j7kw wrote
There’s no labour shortage. There’s a wage shortage. Funny how these free market fucks seem to forget how supply and demand works.
Clarkeprops t1_iyl6345 wrote
Reply to Is my career soon to be nonexistent? by apyrexvision
The pool of jobs that AI can’t do will shrink, but never close. Try to see where there will be gaps, and be there when demand surges.
Clarkeprops t1_iu6ihyu wrote
Reply to UK police fail to meet 'legal and ethical standards' in use of facial recognition by Gari_305
It’s important tech. Can’t we give it to a non profit third party privacy rights group so the guy that abducted a child can be found in time?
Clarkeprops t1_ir5m3pp wrote
Reply to comment by Laserbarrage in See lifelike facial reconstructions of a medieval Scottish woman, priest and bishop by unheated1
Not like we could prove them wrong
Clarkeprops t1_j07df3o wrote
Reply to comment by 0913856742 in The problem isn’t AI, it’s requiring us to work to live by jamesj
Absolutely. I need work for regulation, social connection and I care about my city. AI can never take away every avenue I have to contribute in that way. It might shorten my day a bit… oh no. The horror!
We will never run out of jobs, because our lives will never be too good. There will always be something else to do and some way to provide value. People will always want for something, and people will be there to provide it.