Crabcakes5_
Crabcakes5_ t1_isonv63 wrote
Reply to comment by Grapesoda5k in NATO countries are getting serious about sending armed robots into battle by Gari_305
You inevitably run into the reality that doing so would be mutually assured destruction by the promise that the opposing side could then do the same to your people. The idea that we're going to keep sending soldiers to fight wars when robots become vastly superior is a losing proposition by all accounts of game theory. And, in all likelihood, when this is achieved, we will see treaties emerge that forbid use on civilian populations just as we've seen for dozens of other weapons in history. Of course, terrorist states will always break these rules, but in the end, the cumulative number of lives saved would vastly outweigh those lost.
Crabcakes5_ t1_isom8xu wrote
Reply to comment by Grapesoda5k in NATO countries are getting serious about sending armed robots into battle by Gari_305
If everyone fought entirely with droids, no one would need to die in future wars. They would be fought entirely with money and manufacturing.
Crabcakes5_ t1_isoo8qh wrote
Reply to comment by 11fingerfreak in NATO countries are getting serious about sending armed robots into battle by Gari_305
Nuclear weapons are perfectly capable of doing exactly the same thing, but that hasn't happened yet. Why? Because no one wants the same thing done to them in retaliation. Droid armies wouldn't be used on civilians due to the fear that the other side may use it on theirs.