DakPara
DakPara t1_j19yomr wrote
Reply to comment by Sorry_Ad8818 in Her - (2013 film) | are we fast approaching this for AI romances? by Snipgan
It has some memory now. I can look at the facts it knows from long ago.
I have been using ChatGPT for several weeks now. It is clearly better by far on things before 2021.
DakPara t1_j16lgac wrote
Try Replika
DakPara t1_j11c06a wrote
Reply to To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
It will eventually be similar to the Star Trek Holodeck.
DakPara t1_iwvqgjb wrote
Reply to comment by a-bosh in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
From the paper:
“To approach this problem, we discretize I(s) into piecewise constant segments and obtain the discrete approximation of the integral in terms of the sum of piecewise constant compartments over intervals. This piecewise constant approximation inspired us to introduce an approximate closed-form solution for the integral that is provably tight when the integral appears as the exponent of an exponential decay, which is the case for LTCs. We theoretically justify how this closed-form solution represents LTCs’ ODE semantics and is as expressive (Fig. 1).”
Not quite a math solution, but a great accomplishment if it performs as well as they hope.
DakPara t1_iwvpucd wrote
Reply to comment by Rakshear in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
Agreed.
When I opened the paper, I thought they were talking about an elementary function closed-form solution. I thought “Wow, what math sorcery did they use for that !”. Then I read it and they created a provably tight approximation. Good enough to use and computationally efficient. But not the same as a true math solution.
DakPara t1_iwv089e wrote
Reply to MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
So it’s not solved. It is a “closed form approximation”.
DakPara t1_it3426r wrote
I see zero need to even suggest human brain function relies on quantum computation.
“Brain Water”? Really?
DakPara t1_isawlu4 wrote
Reply to DeepMind breaks 50-year math record using AI; new record falls a week later by Melodic-Work7436
I find this very impressive.
DakPara t1_irsv5k9 wrote
They are mostly gone already
DakPara t1_irs5ec2 wrote
I don’t know if anything or anyone else is conscious. All I can see is behavior and project myself on to that. I could be the only conscious entity in the universe for all I know.
Consciousness doesn’t matter in AI. Is Alpha Go conscious? It still makes superhuman Go moves. Many say it plays like an alien.
If an AI can outsmart collective humanity, it is likely conscious in a way we cannot comprehend.
It becomes philosophy at that point.
DakPara t1_iqp11iy wrote
I was impressed by their work on actuators. It shows they are starting from first principles. And progress in a year was decent IMO.
DakPara t1_ja572ml wrote
Reply to An ICU coma patient costs $600 a day, how much will it cost to live in the digital world and keep the body alive here? by just-a-dreamer-
Less