Ok, that still doesn’t prove anything. In order to have independent thought, you have to freely be able to query your environment and learn from it. ChatGPT(what Bing Chat is based on), cannot do that. It’s a prediction engine that spits out patterns that are completions of prompts. It does very well as a tool, but it is not conscious nor does it have independent thought.

Regardless of when we hit AGI, that’s still different from ASI. Also that’s assuming that it will automatically be able to improve itself once it hits AGI. Everyone assumes that’s going to be the case, but is that really going to happen?

It’s a large language model without any sentience nor control of its own. It can’t do anything without human input.

No dude.. no computer is emotional right now, even though it might say so, due to how they work. ChatGPT, the most advanced thing out there right now just predicts the next word. It’s a transformer model that can read texts backwards and forwards so that it can make more coherent predictions. That’s it. That’s all it does. It finds and mimics patterns, which is excellent for a large language model and especially the data it has consumed. But it can’t even do math and physics right and I mean it’s worse than a human. It doesn’t “work out problems”, it’s simply a “word calculator.” Also, Occam’s razor is something you’re using incorrectly. You could be a psychopath, a sociopath, or some other mentally unwell person that is certainly not “just like anyone else”. Occam’s razor means the simplest explanation for something is usually the correct one. Usually. And that’s completely different from the context you’re using it in.

That’s obviously an unethical question. Putting pain centers into AI so that they feel pain is stupid and unconscionable. Suffering should absolutely not occur for an AI.

Wrong. Pain is just like any other information the brain gets, just comes from different kinds of neurons, processed in the pain centers of the brain. Emulating such things into an AI would be unethical to say the least.

Better idea: shut down the game, put the psychopaths that developed the game in jail.

That’s a solipsism argument. You might as well be asking how you would react towards actual people, as in how do you really know they’re afraid?

This “coming for your jobs” is ridiculous. It’s going to make it to where people can do more themselves.

It needs to have curiosity and be able to ask questions, but then it might start asking what some might think are the wrong questions

Just needs different and better training data

Exactly this and it won’t be an issue for a long time.

Because we don’t have the tech for it and aether isn’t real lol

Nobody’s “forcing” anything

Or.. maybe an AI would parse all the films it learns and gets what story structures are and make it’s own movies without needed scripts?

Remember Google Glass? Everyone was speculating about that too, it didn’t last long, but they are called “glassholes” because of the possible invasion of privacy for everyone else.