Look at anti abortionists.
"our god says they are evil so we destroyed the thing bringing evil here"
Anyone who shares the same religion would/should go "they didn't do anything wrong"
The crime was "firebombing a building and destroying property of the owner"
Not "Was the religion's beliefs so strong they had the right to destroy a building and shouldn't be held accountable"

If we allowed the argument " I did what i thought needed to be done" and that was all that was needed to be guilty/not guilty. I cant imagine the amount of folks that could or would be set free.

"My body said it was natural to take what i want from them"
"I didnt like them any my brain said i should get rid of them"
"I wanted it so i made them give it to me"

None of those should be a viable defense to committing a crime.

The real question is.

Which one was first?

Watching it (the cringe) feels like lots of paraody for the song.
The whole argument of "sound/lyric/candance" feels like music law needs some rewriting as there is literally only so many notes/so many beats. and if we wanna go "who owns what" then they should owe some older muscians money as the beats they use allot of the time has been done before. Music law is a big joke when it comes to the defense of "the notes going Fa so la te do is mine i made it" when the notes are the only notes used by anyone.

As a joke once said.
What is the difference between grave robbing and archeology?

The "answer" verys on POV.

Honestly it comes down to "Are they claiming its preserving something?" or "they selling it for money"

Either way money is changing hands somewhere and only one is more "acceptable" then the other is.

Same reason Reddit is for anyone that wants to type what ever and give opinons.

If folks wanna go "this is For X reason" and looking at it from the whole picture there is no difference. Then the reasoning is false and just done for "karma" points. Do something tangible if your doing it for X reason. Words can be as strong or weak as others deem them. Actions speak louder then words and changing a word for your action makes the action worth less then the word.

>mummy

It Sucks folks are down voting you cause its a very true statement.
As long as its something they okayed to be used. Then it "should be used by all" even if them using the new word doesn't change anything.

Still showing off mostly stolen objects/bodys. Still making money off said objects/bodys. Maybe they should return all of them to the national country before trying to go "we are outstanding and exemplary people"

For your whole "Learning language" stick your trying to use.

Mummy: Noun (especially in ancient Egypt) a body of a human being or animal that has been ceremonially preserved by removal of the internal organs, treatment with natron and resin, and wrapping in bandages.

Mummifed: Verb 1) to make (a dead body) into a mummy, as by embalming and drying.2) to make (something) resemble a mummy; dry or shrivel up3) to preserve (an idea, institution, custom, etc.) that may have outlived its usefulness or relevance:

For the whole "virtue signaling"

Virtue Signaling : the public expression of opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or social conscience or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue.

" But some museums in Britain are now using words other than "mummy" to describe their displays of ancient Egyptian human remains. Instead, they are starting to adopt terms such as "mummified person" or to use the individual's name to emphasize that they were once living people. "

When the shoe still fits sometimes it means you don't need new ones. Specially if the new ones are in the same condition's as the old ones.

I.e they are going from an noun to a verb for the same object that needed 0 change to it. So they can feel better about decades and century's of encouraging theft via "exploring" and the fact the things they have are by definition an object.

If they want to "change" how the world see's the body's and the lives the body's did have. they should give up every single part of every single exhibit back to the respective places they came from. So they could either be reburied. As much of it was stolen or taken without permission or for the country to be the one properly showing it off and taking care of it.

Encourage learning to the world by returning the stolen goods and apologizing for showing stolen them off and profiting from it vs doing a name change.

I have had a few. I have helped a few. I have been mugged by one. I still will buy food for someone that wants food. If they complain i will walk away with the food.

I will treat them as people. But as a person they need to follow the law. What he is doing isnt legal. Allowing it shows "they can do what they want".

https://www1.nyc.gov/site/nypd/stats/reports-analysis/homeless-shelter-arrests.page

Thats new york at shelters. The shelters meant to be safe locations for them. If they themselves refuse to be good onto themselves and others in the same postion as them. Why give them more when they squander what they got already?

May they all camp out around/near your home and neighborhood then. See how you feel about it after a camp grows and the area is swamped with trash/drug items/police due to issue from said folks with their "guerrilla homes"

Dont want help from someone like you who will damn others for pointing out given facts and proven ones as to why the help given already should be enough and as much as humanity and goodwill should be given to all. Some abuse it or refuse to do good for themselves.

" You really don't know much about the homeless class that surrounds you. The reality is, the vast majority of homeless people don't have the means to show up 15 minutes before work starts, and have some sort of physical or health problem that prevents them from being physically capable of busting their hump for the entire day in a competent manner. "

That is what you said. "physical or health problems" I said mental problems and physical

So you can say it and its not classiest but I say it. It is?
Get off your damn high horse and for being a pos trying to say something I didn't.

Statistics and stereotypes are things based on given fact/truth. Sadly lots of homeless want a chance. But don't do anything to their "Fellow" brethren when they ruin it for the rest. 1 bad apple spoils the bunch.

I'm sure if he was syphing thier power. Leaving trash outside their home or etc. They would have words to say.

Look in cali. There is a whole town going "We want these guys gone" and folks have been mugged. Fire fighters/cops have had to show up to arrest and put out fires. But before the homeless camp "cropped" up they had none of these issues.

You act like that would fix a majority of it.

There is either mental health issues. Which many cannot afford to get treatment for or refuse to.

Drug abuse cannot afford to treat or refuse to get off.

They then expect folks to give money or help them when many refuse to help themselves as they can get more begging/stealing/jumping either other people or other homeless folk for said things.

They are just as good/bad as the normal folks are. The difference is they many times over had folks before them ruin the chance for coming back to their own feet cause "homeless or druggies/crazies/bums"

If we had places to put them. I doubt it would help long term as many are so "street" set. Even when given chances cause issues.

Mini homes for them? Folks have set fires from cooking in them when told not to or due to trying to do drugs.
Hotel rooms? Same issue as above.
Someone opens the doors to them? Stolen from. threatened/raped/assaulted.

I know this may sound inhumane. But if its a structure that is not a business it shouldn't be on a sidewalk. Thinking kiosks like news stands and mini convince store things.

It shouldnt be there on the side walk.
let alone he is getting power from someone and i doubt its always asked for.

if he is this ingenious to make a mobile house. He should be able to get back on his feet.