Future_Club1171
Future_Club1171 t1_j6dysd4 wrote
Reply to comment by skeeve87 in ELI5: Why do imaginary numbers even need to exist? by Tharsis101
Given what I’ve heard of most engineers, because we have software designed to solve all that stuff most of the stuff in class we don’t use ourselves lol. Though understanding the theory behind it still helps. Specially when something goes wrong you know what to look for.
Future_Club1171 t1_j6cys20 wrote
Reply to comment by skeeve87 in ELI5: Why do imaginary numbers even need to exist? by Tharsis101
It’s been awhile for me, not a control engineer but did my studies in mechanical engineering. So can’t speak for what you use in your day to day, but from what I remember controls (the math behind it) is tied with laplus transformation and the whole 1/t. Basically from those classes for feedback controls the zeros in laplus will say how it behaves in real life. And one way to avoid real zeros is forcing imaginary ones.
Future_Club1171 t1_j6cy1ut wrote
Reply to comment by Krixwell in ELI5: Why do imaginary numbers even need to exist? by Tharsis101
Imaginary numbers get like that. Since well most there uses are in higher maths.
Future_Club1171 t1_j6bmjid wrote
Reply to comment by Frednotbob in ELI5: Why do imaginary numbers even need to exist? by Tharsis101
For basics i is basically the square root of negative 1, this lets it do a couple useful things cause when dealing with control systems you can help avoid real zeros by tweaking the controls to create zeros at imaginary points ( which for a quadratic is always in a A +- root(B) form). So instead of stalling out it will occilate. For a simplified case, imaginary numbers let us make a cruise control that won’t just stop working on a highway.
Future_Club1171 t1_j214zy7 wrote
Reply to comment by atomfullerene in ELI5: If astronomers use "light-years" for interstellar distances, why do we use AU for interplanetary distances instead of "light-minutes"? by concorde77
I mean just like imperial, the units are based on SI which is mostly metric. Anything SI with distance can and is defined in meters. It’s just that using meters to convey such quickly gets messy since the universe isn’t going to make everything near round numbers. To give you a fermi approx of an AU, light takes 498 seconds to reach earth, light travels at 2.998x10^8 meters/second, therefore 1 AU is approximately 1.5x10^11 meters, that’s 150 gigameters, note the earth is only 40 mega meters even by the original meter definition.
Future_Club1171 t1_jefvzns wrote
Reply to comment by starion832000 in ELI5: If the chemical dopamine stimulates a 'feel good' sensation, is there a chemical that makes us angry? by Kree_Horse
Technically, but addictive in the same way working out, watching movies, or a book can be addictive. Basically it’s just your go to source for dopamine, but for the most part sources can be interchangeable. I.e someone who is addicted to gun could probably scratch that itch with a fps game or action movie (on a stimulus basis at least). This does differ from chemical addiction cause while the initial spark is from dopamine, the other chemical triggers makes it stick differently. If you are chemically addicted to nicotine for instance you ease it just from other stimuli, since it’s specifically the nicotine your body is missing.