According to the internet , they only did that to make fun of the Beatles for supposedly only being part of the " psychedelic " culture wanting money and l don't know from what l read it seems like the Beatles inspired them or motivated rather . Who cares really , Im just saying they made the best ever . However they did it . Plenty of people were inspired by others but the didn't do constant outstanding pieces of art like the Beatles had done .

Whos gonna realize something thats not true at all

I really was like that too . I heard everything , until I really heard everything . Listen to all of Revolver . Who here is arguing . All we need is love and love is all we need . I didn't know they were like that in the eighties . I wasn't here , there , or anywhere back then . Thats like two decades before me. Also he never practiced ? ? That just made his drumming even more better if so .

That piano backing in You Wont See Me always gets me

Im referring to talent not popularity just talent with them. As for their drummer being suub par , HA ! ! Thats funny . Why not listen to the wiiide range of drumming techniques he was capable of . As for influential , they literally were so influential that the people who influenced them were influenced by them. They were pioneers to sounds that weren't even thought of. Anything else you said explains why people who know more about what they did than just Yellow Submarine , or Hey Jude , say that they're underrated and its true they are underrated now and in your hundred yers from now.

The Kinks and The Who really were an influence. What about the addiction thing ? I only thought that was some kind of a rumor . So they had more pumping into their veins than pumping into their musiic ? Did the Stones really spend that much on it ? I know Brian really had issues with it and Brian sure was taking them places in the sixties . The sixties was obviously their best of their best in their makings. Did all that happen after or what

They did some great pieces after. Some. But they knew when to stop sooo

The Monkees didn't even write their stuff mostly. They were just a manufactured band , a manufactured band originally for television . What about the Stones . They had the funding so much funding they kept going but they somehow just don't really compare even though they tried to copy and copy The Beatles

The Beatles , ever heard of them

Im not gonna get on you about that inaccurate comment but what Im gonna do is say listen to Revolver song by song , then listen to Sgt Pepper , then realize when those both were released . Then listen to Magical Mystery Tour and realize it came out right after Sgt Pepper not even a year away and realize they didn't even take the pieces in the albm seriously in Magical Mystery Tour . They literally shat out a work of art there . After that then realize that they played the instruments or directed how the instruments were to be played . After that then go back and listen to Rubber Soul and see their art evolve at a constant high and thaank me lateer hateer alright

By far. Also the covers they done were just " baby steps " , they were simplr just trying out their harmonic ranges through melodic synchronization with the famee that they were getting. Its known that they were very much into trying new things and evolving themselves. That's where we get into innovation. They literally had innovation. Especially after Beatles For Sale . The last albm with covered pieces . They were originators after that .

Come on , they're the closest thing we have to Mozart , Bach , Tchaikovsky , or even Beethoven . Thats why they're underrated . They are all underrated in today's generation really .

I surrendr . You got a piont .