RanyaAnusih
RanyaAnusih t1_j4pw07w wrote
Reply to comment by wwarnout in Physicist Max Planck on Idealism and the Role of Faith in Science by owlthatissuperb
Good thing faith is not defined that way
RanyaAnusih t1_j39bhb7 wrote
Reply to comment by aesu in The Persistent Problem of Consciousness: an astronaut's epiphany by simsquatched
Im also not talking about your personal observation. All of us come from the same species so of course our brains will decode reality almost the same and we will all agree. For a truly unbiased perspective, you would need a different entity. As a colorful example think of the movie Arrival if you have seen it.
That something works, just means it works. There is nothing more to conclude. Just like when a mouse pushes a lever and someone always gives it a piece of cheese after doing so
As i said, the mysticism comes from admitting thai it would be a huge coincidence if humans have access to fundamental truths just based on their limited reason and logic. We already know that there are truths that presumably escape your pets, so why assume it ends with us. That is what i mean in saying that humans are either special or they aren't; we cant just put ourselves on a pedestal of knowledge and at the same time claim we are just another animal
RanyaAnusih t1_j392veb wrote
Reply to comment by aesu in The Persistent Problem of Consciousness: an astronaut's epiphany by simsquatched
All your observations are filtered and modeled by your mind. That things work means only that you have a model that can predict, nothing more; Just because you have an equation for it does not mean gravity is any less bizarre or "explained"
Just your use of the words before and after implies an understanding of the concept of "time" which we havent.
You know, nothing is solved but there is a reason Albert Einstein had to ask his colleagues if they seriously believed the moon is not there when nobody looks at it.
Reality is just not that simple
RanyaAnusih t1_j38to1g wrote
Reply to comment by aesu in The Persistent Problem of Consciousness: an astronaut's epiphany by simsquatched
Just the word observables is problematic. We dont even know what are space or time to begin with, nor consciousness. It would be a huge coincidence if human brains have the potential of understanding the nature of reality. Either we are special or we arent. It can't be both
RanyaAnusih t1_j38k28v wrote
Reply to comment by aesu in The Persistent Problem of Consciousness: an astronaut's epiphany by simsquatched
Nobody knows reality. There is nothing to ignore. You just think you know something
RanyaAnusih t1_iyf8uns wrote
Reply to Songs with “Mexican horns” by Gloomy-Beautiful-943
Listen to tu falta de querer by Mon laferte. Her specialty is mixing pop rock and mexican rhythms
Ciega sordomuda by Shakira too.
RanyaAnusih t1_iyf8b2c wrote
Reply to Please help me find this band’s name! by LadyMadonna87
Either Hanson, Sum 41, Good Charlotte or Simple Plan
RanyaAnusih t1_iy1w9gt wrote
Debasser by Pixies. Common, just listen to it
Freak on a Leash by Korn. It slaaps
RanyaAnusih t1_ixtssof wrote
Reply to comment by AlParsonsFinalWords in The Beatles Made The Best Music Ever - Disagree and Make Me Laugh by HarryBalsonia69
Songs like please please me, she loves you and hard's day night were more original than anytjing around. A true combination of the explosiveness of rock n roll with melancholic british folk melodies and out of field structures and effects
RanyaAnusih t1_j6nlgk7 wrote
Reply to comment by AUFunmacy in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy
Only an understanding of quantum theory has any hope of explaining consciousness. Complexity in networks most likely will not solve the issue.
Life is taking advantage of quantum processes at a fundamental level.
The current model of neuroscience is also misleading. Some kind of enactivism must be considered