HebrewHammer14

HebrewHammer14 t1_j8pmz0c wrote

As someone who has 2 kids ( one of which with autism) zoom schooling was the absolute worst for elementary aged kids. And honestly you’re a moron if you think otherwise. Kids do not have the capacity to sit in front of a screen to learn all day. Kids also need the social interaction and structure of in school learning(especially special needs children).

4

HebrewHammer14 t1_j7yue13 wrote

How would you invest in the community? Which communities are we speaking about? I agree that just throwing money at police isn’t necessarily the answer, especially considering that I’d be worried about where that money would be taken from. I’m not for bolstering police if it meant something like taking away social programs for kids. Maybe something they could do would be to invest more money in the schools. Pay the teachers better and just in general invest more money into the future generations.

1

HebrewHammer14 t1_j7ukzv4 wrote

Well I guess my next question would be if we are so low in spending, then why isn’t their room for improvement in terms of spending on more police to patrol places that are known for high crime? with more emphasis on public spaces. I don’t disagree with much of anything you said.

Also maybe give more leeway to home and business owners to protect their property. Right now if someone breaks into my house or business and gets hurt while trespassing I get sued for something I had no control of. Meanwhile if they are their to attack, I’m suppose to runaway and am not allowed to protect myself. All the current system does in my eyes is incentivizes crime on personal property and places all the blame on the owner.

1

HebrewHammer14 t1_j7u7x6x wrote

I think overall we are safer as a state. If not for the police , laws and rights we have which differ from state to state then why would you say we are safer per capita than 95% of the rest of the country? By the way, I believe the only states safer than us are Maine and Vermont if I’m not mistaken. So why is this region of the country leaps and bounds safer than the rest?

−2

HebrewHammer14 t1_j0vbc69 wrote

It should really be simple. The residents are assuming everyone who is homeless is a drug addict or criminal which isn’t the case. Allow this to happen, make a requirement of no drugs or arrests while a resident and having to keep your own space clean. If they can’t follow those simple rules then they get booted out. Sometimes it’s just a family who’s living on a couch or out of their car but need to be in the city.

6

HebrewHammer14 t1_izptr86 wrote

Boston area that are triple deckers or 2 families it’s very true. You may not want to hear it but it’s true.

Also they ladder is happening all over the country. It’s actually a hot button issue at the moment and a big reason people are fighting that big corporations shouldn’t be involved in residential housing

1

HebrewHammer14 t1_izniour wrote

2 things I’ve seen. 1- landlords prefer section 8 assistance because it is guaranteed income and they don’t have to worry about you not paying or losing your job or another pandemic where they struggle to pay the mortgage because not only are you not paying but they can’t evict you so they lose the property. 2-lots of corporation landlords that have tons of property in one area aren’t actually looking for tenants, they just pretend to and leave the places vacant to artificially inflate demand and inflating rent prices.

In short, you’re f*cked.

0