IAmAgainst

IAmAgainst OP t1_ja4j3hq wrote

Yes.. I know most people would find it an odd choice but using tubes for doing the actual amplifying seems unnecessary to me now that we have semiconductors to do that job. It wears out tubes faster and the output impedance is too high for my headphones at least (unless you buy a $2.5K amp, which I won't). I researched for hybrid amps and I couldn't find anyone with unanimously positive reviews so I thought that the most technically correct solution would be using discrete units that perform their own specific task instead of one combo that does two completely different things. And a preamp leaves the possibility open for using in a speakers setup as well.

3

IAmAgainst t1_ja40gxn wrote

I don't feel I'm missing anything with the Aryas but if I ever upgrade it will be for those ones. With their price, there's no reason to buy the Aryas when the HE1000 are so close. I paid €1000 for the Aryas but if I were to buy them new I would save a little bit more and go for the HE1000.

2

IAmAgainst t1_j88o76k wrote

I'm glad I could help.. The Arya V2 doesn't have a good rep because of a huge gap they have in the frequency response, although that should be possible to correct with equalization. Which is why I find most headphones reviews useless since they only talk about each headphone raw as if equalizing wasn't a thing.

2

IAmAgainst t1_j88765g wrote

Oh, I understand your question now. The RCA maximum output value is 3.5V and for the XLR output it's 6.9V. However you can control the volume to avoid saturating your preamp input so that shouldn't be a problem.

In any case, you won't burn anything. If the input signal is too high you would just get a distorted output because of clipping at the input so you'd have to gradually increase the ADI-2's volume until you start noticing a degradation in sound.

Edit: you don't need the THX-887, you'd just be adding noise to the system and reducing SNR. Most likely imperceptible but still unnecessary. The ADI-2's built-in amp should be far superior, especially considering the integration with the dac that allows to balance digital and analog amplification to maintain the highest possible dynamic range and SNR.

2

IAmAgainst t1_j882iic wrote

The title of your post asks one question and the body says a completely different thing. It has balanced and unbalanced analog outputs to be used as a DAC-only, and the equalizer makes it the best DAC out there IMHO. The spectrum analyzer is hypnotic to watch and the VU meter is extremely useful to get an idea of the dynamic range of the source and to get an objective reference of the actual output volume you're getting regardless of the amplification level (because each song has a different volume usually).

But it doesn't have analog inputs to act as a preamp. I don't know what you read that could have given you the idea that it might have.

The amp is as good as an amp could get so you won't ever need a discrete one just for the sake of amplifying for headphones, and it's tightly integrated with the DAC in a way that always keeps a SNR as high as possible.

Finally, and this is an important disadvantage for me, it doesn't have an external analog input to the amp section, which would allow it to be connected to a tube preamp and then back to it's own amp section.

Hope this clarifies what it can and cannot do. Let me know if you have any other questions.

3

IAmAgainst t1_j881fln wrote

The are great $200 headphones and mind-blowing ones for $1500, you'll have to set a budget so that people can recommend you the best options for that price.

My advice for now would be to rip your CD collection into flacs (or just download them if you can find them in that format, which you will for the most popular titles) so you can listen to them wherever and whenever you want from a PC or phone, having immediate access to every song without having to change the discs. Using a PC will also give you the possibility of equalizing your headphones, which is a huge plus.

1