ImACredibleSource
ImACredibleSource t1_it8rx6x wrote
Reply to comment by starstruckmon in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
Artists actually have to be very careful about making derivative work without attribution. There's been loads of cases about it. Even the guy who duct taped the banana to the wall is getting sued because he took the idea from someone else.
ImACredibleSource t1_it8q8lq wrote
Reply to comment by starstruckmon in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
Evrything that is generated is based on work made by real artists.
ImACredibleSource t1_it8oqr8 wrote
Reply to comment by starstruckmon in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
Same way musicians get sued for using a specific melody. If it's sampled and not properly attributed, this can cause huge problems. Especially for big companies with lots of money to be taken in a lawsuit
ImACredibleSource t1_it8ogz6 wrote
Reply to comment by drakt12 in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
It's just a tool. People are freaking out the same way they did when photography came out, and that it would kill painting. Or when the record came out, and people thought it was the end of live musicians.
I think art, music, dance, literature, etc. Will be the last things to be automated. It's much easier to displace jobs with a clear logic and rules like medicine, or law than it is for art. And the whole discussion kind of annoys me because nobody seems to acknowledge this.
ImACredibleSource t1_iy731bb wrote
Reply to comment by birdsneedkarmatoo in Mothers and wives of conscripts from Russian Far East to be sent to east of Ukraine by HarakenQQ
Stalnist tactics of colonization.