It was a hearing they held. Probably a negligible amount

The irony of you acting like I've made some stereotypical 'Reddit response' by giving the most stereotypical Reddit response possible is palpable.

Probably time to step away from the computer for a little, friend. Fresh air once every few months can be good for you.

It was a question.

Do you think courts have no point because the possibility exists that a conviction can be vacated?

Guilty people are fine with being incarcerated? Huh?

A court of law also vacated that conviction, before reinstating it. If it’s vacated again do you think that’s evidence he is innocent?

Maybe I missed some information about this story, but what did the trooper do exactly? If it was secured in the car, isn’t that how they’re supposed to keep them?

Is there a point in them being named?

What an embarrassing way to act

It’s not that no one for the joke. It’s that the joke isn’t funny.

My work paid for my business laptop so it’s fine

You and I are reading very different threads

We all know you can’t do that without the occasional ecological crisis, right?

It was, regardless, a federal attempt at seizing the property. The person you responded to was referring to the states actions and laws.

That was an attempt federally, which failed.

> Lol, so you didn't even read my question.

I read your comment, there was no question in it. Did you read mine? I’m wondering where the personal opinion is.

>Good luck to you.

Thanks buddy!

> "is this offered in clear" is a question.

I don’t see where you said that. Also, where did I state my personal opinion?

> I'm trying to get an answer to a question and you want to interupt it with your personal opinion.

You didn’t ask a question, and I didn’t state an opinion.

>I called my kids school and told them some guy on reddit said we don't need clear backpacks, so I'm not going to buy one. Thanks for the help. Problem solved.

I didn’t say your kids school didn’t require a clear backpack lol. Maybe if you’d understood what I said you wouldn’t have gotten yourself so worked up?

> You're right I'm just making it up.

I mean I don’t know if you’re making it up, I just know that you’re wrong. Also this is a very funny overreaction to what I said.

No, most American schools do not

That’s a real meat and potatoes list there

> Aren't the only new additions are the scenes in the epilogue?

I've never read they were exclusive to then.

It also included a ton of money and reshoots, so not really a directors cut in the traditional sense. 9/10 also seems… high.

It is better, but I think calling it a directors cut is a stretch. He basically got to re-film pretty significant chunks of the movie and try and directly address criticism of the initial release (of which not all issues were with Whedon).

> Yeah I screwed that up. By why are you using 16?

I'm making the point that people not making minimum wage are negatively affected.