Jerund

Jerund t1_jaekycl wrote

So because they can’t afford other necessities means they get a pass on fare evading? I see plenty of people wearing nice clothings and are still farebeating. Let’s be realistic here, most people who are fare beating are not poor. You see them just walking through the emergency gates at time square with AirPods in their ears. Those who are struggling have either half off or free metro ride from the MTA fair fare program. But keep trying to label everyone is poor in nyc.

−1

Jerund t1_jaei872 wrote

Fare went up .50 cents (22%) since Bloomberg was in office. Median individual income went up by 26% since then. The rate of change is fairly proportional, so why can’t people afford to pay the fare? I mean it’s either those who use it pay for it partially or a tax on everyone to pay for it. You can say it should be free all you want, the money to fund it should come from somewhere.

0

Jerund t1_jaczsqp wrote

Well, it’s either gonna be a tax on everyone and make it free or NYPD will actually enforce it. I don’t see how it’s a problem with the NYPD actually enforcing the rules by ticketing and the courts actually collecting the fine. No dropping of the fine provided there is enough evidence.

How come fare evasion wasn’t that big of a problem when it was during Bloomberg’s administration?

0

Jerund t1_ja7ujgx wrote

Like I said again, I didn’t define my “data” on what is considered rich. You came in with the assumption that someone rich is someone who is a millionaire. You don’t need to be a millionaire (usd) to be “rich” in China. Even if you have 400k usd, you would be considered rich. In a tier 2 city, you can buy like 4-6 apartments with cash and rent that out. Your standard of living is much lower in China compared to USA. If you have a million dollars in america, I wouldn’t even consider that rich because everything is much more expensive.

0

Jerund t1_ja7t62d wrote

I never defined the parameters for being rich to be a millionaire. I meant it as rich enough to buy Starbucks or whatever American product that is marked up very high. Obviously if they can’t afford to buy it, companies wouldn’t be entering the market and selling it at that price. Sir, this post is about coffee. What else would I be talking about? I replied to the person regarding how it’s difficult to imagine Chinese people buying highly marked up American products

0

Jerund t1_ja7rsnb wrote

Ummm… you don’t need to be a millionaire to buy a cup of coffee…. Even in the usa, people who are buying coffee from Starbucks aren’t rich. You have those in the middle class living paycheck to paycheck buying it. So definitely hundreds of million of people can buy that cup of coffee which is already a lot of people

1

Jerund t1_j9yioh4 wrote

Federal money is used for the war. California themselves uses state money to build the high speed rail. It seems like money wasn’t the issue for this HSR. Too many land rights and bad planning. We invested most of our money in airports instead. Look at how many airports we have compared to rest of the world. Think we have more than the next 5 countries combined

1

Jerund t1_j9ue032 wrote

What I said earlier was from another source that I read months ago. But speaking back to the income statement posted. You see bitcoin revenue dropped from 10B in 2021 to 7B in 2022. Yes cost for bitcoin also decreased, but for overall growth of revenue, you see it stayed the same for 2021 to 2022. Assuming btc trading didn’t decrease, their revenue for 2022 would be an extra of almost 3 billion dollars.

2

Jerund t1_j9ubwrw wrote

They invested a lot into btc before the 2020 period and when the value of it increased, they had to report that as income. Think the reporting rules changed under trumps administration. That’s why you have companies like Berkshire report big gains and then big losses. During the btc peak area. They also kinda double down on btc. So when btc drop, they also took a hit.

1

Jerund t1_j9u83dc wrote

I think same revenue for 2021 to 2022 is big. In 2021, btc was trading at the peak of 60k a coin. Lots of revenues from that. Now btc in 2022 dropped to as low as 18k at one point and less people trading it. Yet their revenue was consistent. Their core business is growing and factor in after pay acquisition. I see long term potential

2