Some childrens tv shows or media programs stating incorrect information does not make it correct. Additive primaries are RGB, subtractive primaries are CMY. The idea that RBY are primary colors is a popular misconception, but is incorrect. It has it's roots in art classes prior to proper scientific investigation of color, light, and modern technology. If your goal is art history, then yes, people in the past incorrectly believed that the primary colors (both additive and subtractive) were RBY. They were wrong. Just as people believed the earth was flat, yet were wrong.

Yeah that's just incorrect. Additive primaries are RGB. Subtractive primaries are CMY. You're free to deny the facts all you'd like, but this is just an objective scientific thing.

Yes. You do realize our eyes only have three kinds of cones right? Rgb are the primary colors lol. Cmy if you're looking at subtractive colors. Using these three colors, you can create every other color. Rgb for light/additive, Cmy for ink/paint/subtractive.

Rby is not primary in any sense of the word.

That's literally what primary colors are. How do you think screens and printers are able to produce every color despite only working with 3 of them? Because that's literally what primary colors are.

Well no. That's been incorrect since the beginning of time. This is a factual scientific topic. There is a correct answer and incorrect answer. It's not up to preference or opinion. Printers use cyan, magenta, and yellow, because those are the subtractive primary colors. If you used red, blue, and yellow, you can't actually produce the rest of the colors with those. Since red and blue aren't primary for subtractive color, but rather iirc secondary. People being wrong for a long time doesn't mean they're right.

There's additive color and subtractive color. The set of red, blue, yellow, is primary for neither. Additive primaries are red, blue, green. Subtractive primaries are cyan, yellow, magenta. If you're mixing paints you're working with subtractive color and thus the primary colors are cyan, yellow, and magenta. not red, blue, and yellow.

The info is incorrect no matter the context.

Yellow isn't a primary color. The primary colors are red, green, and blue.

"instruction": "What are the three primary colors?",
"input": "",
"output": "The three primary colors are red, blue, and yellow."

No wonder they give false info. garbage in, garbage out lol.

paywalled though and likely will be just as censored. It's also currently not available. So.... who cares?

Could you give an example?

huh? youchat is pretty accurate when it comes to information for the most part. It does get stuff wrong here and there (particularly on niche topics), but for the most part it's solid.

Try you.com's youchat. I've been using it for quite a while now as my default search engine and it works great. No moody tone, no censoring or moralizing, just plain responses and information you ask for with cited reference links to follow.

I'm not a fan of perplexity as it's not a general use chatbot and instead just answers questions.

You can literally just use the you.com website without logging in...

I'm using you.com/chat as my primary default search engine now. AFAIK they are indeed just blowing money to get users. Though they do have a few paid services (none of which I use tbh).

I have adblock/trackblock so I can't say how they are on that front other than their claims/promises...

Never had this issue with stable diffusion. Perhaps stop using apps by corporations? I just finetuned a model on my own pics, then was able to generate stylized pics just fine.

It's not AI's fault. It's the company's fault.

It's failing because you're asking the ai to think. It does not think.

Yup. That's my view as well. I'm guessing we'll get watchable vidoes maybe within 5 years. And from there it'll be a small niche where people make their own indie movies, but that's not up to hollywood quality just yet. A few years after that I imagine it might be used in hollywood for a movie or two. It'll take a long while before they switch over entirely.

Hard to say, but I'm not expecting it soon.

voted 10 years or more. Anyone saying otherwise does not understand humans, and does not understand current AI.

Just recently we got the very first announcements of an AI being able to generate a simple video. The video was incredibly poor quality, suffered the usual temporal consistency issues, was very short, lacked audio, etc.

It'll take a few years at least for ai generated videos to be deemed "human-watchable" rather than "first steps in research". So that's already looking like 2-5 years at least.

From there, we'll likely end up seeing the same issues that stable diffusion is facing today, with many people in the field opposing it's use.

Lastly, you put "most" in the criteria, meaning over 50% of content. This is extremely unlikely, even if such content does manage to appear within the next decade. If we do hit such a deadline, it'll only initially be a small portion of content at the beginning.

My estimate is that I expect some portion of content (say, less than 30%) to be ai generated within 50 years. Referring here to books, youtube videos, and comics/manga, along with music.

Though I'm fairly conservative in this regard, so I guess we'll see.

Yes. Look at stable diffusion and riffusion for an example of this. Music isn't fundamentally different from images and text in terms of how modern AI works.

well it wouldn't be "MusicGPT", but yes, ai music is already a thing. Such as with riffusion (stable diffusion trained on spectrograms to create music).

you're correct about the controversy though. All modern AI work in the same way: by curating a dataset that's used to train a neural network's weights, and then those weights are used to produce something related to the dataset. So just as art AI uses images in the training that people yell about copyright issues, music AI will use music in the training that people may also complain about.

It worked wonders for me. Pretty much nothing else worked in my experience. But with dopamine detox I actually managed to write and publish a book.

Dopamine detox works. Stay off of social media for a week or two. Do either nothing and sit there, or work. Took a few hours but it kicked in and started working quite well.

Have they solved the money issue yet? As long as blockchains are paywalled and only deal with ownership of digital tokens, they will always be entirely useless.

There's so much that's wrong here...