same for you ignoring your original contract. You now want the owner to be obligated to continue at cap priced increase indefinitely if you wish to despite the original term length discussed & agreeed

> receive one if they’re in good standing per the lease agreement.

with price caps on the increase....missing that much again? essentially making market unit rent regulated with a perpetual lease

> You were in another thread saying this will only increase housing discrimination, lmfao.

oh it will def

works both ways. if subject finds a better deal elsewhere but cant switch due to good standing. end of the day, there is a contract length and it was met. Parties are free to continue not obligated

how can you claim no price cap but then tells me there's a soft cap....hows that misinformation spreading

>"perpetual lease"

both parties knew at start and never agreeed....next time you sign up for internet service for a yr and want to switch at end of contract to some other provider but cant because provider been good standing with you and continues contract indefinitely...this is what you are doing. its absurd.

>Tenants should be able to continue to live in their home as long as they are in good standing per the lease agreement.

Nope you signed a 1 yr lease...you get 1 yr. Next time sign a 10 yr or longer and pay appropriately and screened for that term

Ya you also ignoring the price cap and perpetual lease. The market unit owner and tenant signed lease for finite time, it ended but somehow they deserve perpetual lease at cap prices. If owner knew that was the case from start, the price and screening would have been different.

Owners are simply asking to honor the contract length..,.which this bill ignores and violate. Its not eviction if the lease is up aka the good reason...gasp since you agreed to it the first place but now twisting as if not a good reason

Honestly its dolts like you who can't see the entire forest and why this bill will be terrible for future renters. This bill if pass will backfire terribly

their mindset already set...if a paper is missing a dotted i -therefore entire paper must be tossed and failed

then let the jury and judge decide when case goes to trial...you as defense using it as a excuse to toss entire case before trial over things you know is useless

you simply afraid of it going to trial and using any excuse to prevent it. go to trial argue how important x was not turn over...go ahead lets see if you do

defense don't even use it. they only care its missing. its minutes x other cases and things folks have to do. its mindless busywork for nothing and simple things like this missed shouldn't tank the entire case since entire case not built on this one piece.

>We already have statues that compensate families for wrongful

Not enough especially since the laws written over 100 yrs ago

>Who is asking for this exactly? victim who are kids and elderly for one since current financial compensation reflects on their earning potential...which they have none

how is it important for the defense for statements for someone not even present at the crime/incident? seriously running circles...its only important bc they can claim failure to dot the I to toss entire case.

again...something like this shouldn't toss the entire case since entire prosecution not based on it. let it go to trial, let the jury decide? whats the fear? you get your day in court same with the people vs tossing things on technicality. just don't allow it as evidence against the accused...that's the fair approach. but nope...dolts like you think otherwise

Yes bc every business carries the same risks causing untimely death to others. We aren't talking about suing any random innocent business for no reason....we are talking about a specific entities that caused the unjust death of someone

what evidence used against them? said missing piece not even called as a witness/evidence against the accused....there's a reason why it wasn't collected the first place and presented to court in timely manner...no one care for it...it was not important to case and not plan to use against accused

judge, the jury....then let it go to trial....we arent even reaching that phase. we stuck arguing x is missing out of umpteen docs and want to toss entire case pretrial. you think that's fair? we are literally arguing at the pregame phase over someone the team don't even plan to put in the game

Discovery of relevant information to the case is the right and ethnical thing to do vs right now chasing and bogging down the system chasing irrelevant info that don't matter/change the case but subject entire case to dismissal on a short arbitrary deadline that was setup to fail is insane

You telling me its important to cases to collect the log books and officer complaints/work history of cops that show up and left never saw anything/interacted with victim/perp/witness/anyone is relevant details to waste resources on? and the people not even calling them as a witness. All you creating is mindless paperwork for nothing. No staff/resource in the world can cover that waste of time

Bail reform is not the major issue. Speedy trial and discovery reform is what's really driving the work load and priority of cases at DA offices to work on and abandon for eventually dismissal by 30.30. Which contributes to the appearance of revolving door of perps and lack of priority to resolve the issue by police, courts, govt

Also Gov needs to revisit the Grieving Families Act that she veto due to special interest lobby - another massive failure that no one is talking about nor much in news

Just let the area sink beneath the tides then. Jack up the flood insurance rates for the complaining neighbors.

Ha its like saying majority of police interactions do not result in violent interaction if you talking about all races but if you zoom in on the cases folks protesting about - black and brown interactions with police. It tells a different story.

Same with this story - majority ok...zoom in part ppl care about - violent actors - different story.

Real culprit is not cashless bail. Its speedy trial reform that having a impact on which crimes are prosecuted (mainly high profile incidents) and rest dropped or lesser charges applied in hopes it clears and don't tie up the court systems. If criminals are not prosecuted, why bother to report/arrest to watch them walk back on street to commit more crimes without consequences.

Do it for any crime/misdemeanor/etc that has a fee punishment and you get plenty of folks snitching & earning in no time.

2 lane idea was silly to start with. Not much buffer if one lane slowed down/closed due to accident/repairs/etc.

NYP is free, wildly available and quick to cover local stories. NYT, NY Daily, etc local coverage suck and hide behind paywalls. NYP even beat local tv new coverage to breaking stories and followups. Ppl shiet on NYP and rightfully but they do local coverage better than most.

Sure convert them all to residential. Next complaint will be with all this influx of units that most can't afford to rent increased the city vacancy rate above 5% thus ending rent stabilization. Real estate lobby prob dreaming of this day.

Would argue she's a black nationalist

yup they also adamant to not do any changes that disrupt their promenade view

Also love that we considering a pricey tunnel to improve the neighborhood, and air quality in one of the priciest parts of Brooklyn when we still debating capping highways in poor areas of Bronx that's been asking for a long time.

Tunnel idea basically a want idea to boast their land values & remove the unsightly expressway blocking their views. Fix that road as is, if they want a different route do it and we think about capping it in the future.