KingZarkon

KingZarkon t1_jdzwod4 wrote

>Has nothing to do with wear. Leaded fuel has a very high autoignition point that prevents knock. Modern fuel uses alcohol, but engines designed for alcohol free fuel are dangerously unreliable.

Turns out, it does both, actually.

>Lead allowed the development of higher 'octane number' fuel (the higher the number, the greater the resistance of the fuel to uncontrolled burning in the engine, or 'detonation'), and was also discovered, later, to have the property of protecting valve seats from wear.

Source

As for knock, you could just go all the way. E85, for instance, doesn't detonate, period. You can run the timing all the way to TDC and be fine. Would need bigger fuel tanks, though, so that might cut into payload a bit.

1

KingZarkon t1_jdwgo9p wrote

>Will leaded avgas for small piston planes still be the only common option?

Leaded avgas will certainly be banned by that point, if not sooner. Older engines designed for leaded gas depend on the lead and other additives (like zinc in the oil) for wear protection but those can be managed by adding a bottle of additives to the gas for planes that still need leaded gas.

3

KingZarkon t1_ivbs6ap wrote

From another comment I made, if your throttle is running wide open, then you lose engine vacuum. You have what's in the vacuum reservoir but that's it. Without regenerating it, you have enough to hit the brakes once, maybe twice with good power. After that, there's little chance a person could push the brake pedal hard enough to overcome the engine at full throttle. I suspect these tests have not taken that into consideration.

1