Lirvan
Lirvan t1_ja1o4y1 wrote
Reply to comment by El_CapitanJames in 6.2 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Papua New Guinea by UpstairBit
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-42.94034,-26.36719&extent=68.33438,218.84766
USGS map showing all global earthquakes.
They're constant.
Lirvan t1_j6jk2ms wrote
How is this a diplomatic coup?
He just reached out to the newly elected Czech president, who has previously stated positive things about Taiwan.
Misleading title.
Lirvan t1_j5zus6j wrote
Reply to comment by dieyoufool3 in Japan’s Calls for a “New World Order”: Prof Jacob Kovalio 🎙 r/WorldNews Reddit Talk by AkaashMaharaj
Thank you!
Sounds like wanting to use the expansive language due to desiring a larger change rather than a smaller one. At least, that's what I got out of the answer. Something close to the UN security committee, but limited to democratic nations.
Or perhaps Bretton Woods 2.0.
Lirvan t1_j5ztib2 wrote
Reply to comment by VanVelding in Japan’s Calls for a “New World Order”: Prof Jacob Kovalio 🎙 r/WorldNews Reddit Talk by AkaashMaharaj
There is MUCH more history to the term than just Bush Sr.
Further, there's even a widely popular conspiracy theory that uses the term.
​
Just request an expansion of NATO into the indo-pacific and/or a trade alliance of democratic nations.
Lirvan t1_j5zq0fe wrote
Reply to Japan’s Calls for a “New World Order”: Prof Jacob Kovalio 🎙 r/WorldNews Reddit Talk by AkaashMaharaj
Why use such expansive language as "New World Order" when the main aspect wanting to be addressed would be met by an indo-pacific trade deal combined with looping Japan into the Five Eyes agreement and/or a trilateral defensive pact with Australia/USA?
Would a trade deal and a defensive agreement constitute a "New World Order?"
Further, the "New World Order" term has history in the USA, with George Bush Sr. attempting to use that terminology, and costing him his re-election.
Lirvan t1_jedfqha wrote
Reply to comment by tacit_urn in China calls US debt trap accusation 'irresponsible' by BubsyFanboy
For real. This comment has nothing to do with the article. The article is speaking of China's belt and road initiative for developing countries' infrastructure investments. Not US-based citizen credit/debt cycles.