God dammit!

IT is moving from master/slave to manager/subordinate - so no acronyms have to change.

Duh, restrict cannabis to prescription forms produced by Big Pharma. No sweat, since the War On Unprofitable Drugs marches on in some places.

Reminds me of Japanese soldiers on remote islands still fighting WW2 years after everyone else went home.

This also works wonders on water stains on drop-ceiling tiles.

Also nothing to sue.

Ahhh, so the unbelievable part is that he actually apologized.

Yeah, this one is really an educated sell…

Oh well. 🤷‍♂️

That’s not what I was gonna ask.

My question was more, how does this appear to be satire?

I think school teachers should be allowed to marry have an OF. That’s not related to their teaching position.

Filming in the school is unprofessional and if the school’s panties are bunched they of course can fire her. But I assume they can also fire her for anything.

If it was your school to run you could also overreact as much as you see fit.

The tempest is still firmly in the teapot.

Unprofessional, but forgivable.

If she had been using the classroom on the weekend for labeling jars of home preserves to sell, that would also have been unprofessional.

And about as harmful to the space and the children who will be back next week.

As for why, she’s (is/was) a teacher, so getting bus-ay in a classroom plays into a sexual fantasy. Which probably wouldn’t be that attractive if it wasn’t “forbidden fruit”.

So, atrocious or hot depending on your perspective. 😄

> The problem is not that she had OF the problem is she did a video on a classroom, in a school full of minors.

There were no minors in the school when it was filmed.

“No children were harmed in the making of this video.”

However, the real problem is Puritanism - why can’t this teacher participate in the sexual economy? Why can’t anyone?

EDIT: Several responses have dealt with unprofessionalism, which is not being argued.

It’s the condemnation and overreaction that is problematic.

So no practical format that might be employed to any useful effect.

So the problem isn’t TV-specific but with the nature of the people involved.

Which was the point I was leading to.

What the he will what?

And which format discourages that?

It’s not the “TV format”, it’s the people.

A supercharger is a compressor driven by the engine rotation (belt driven) whereas a turbo charger is driven by exhaust gas pressure.

But then both force air/fuel mixture into the cylinders.

Not even God themself may break the rules of r/Music!